Danny White;1465068 said:I'm sure he'd waive his "no-kill" clause for the final season, though.
It'd be a way to go out with a "bang" so to speak. :
Danny White;1464754 said:I thought that was a very solid episode.
I love it when they spend time on the root characters like Paulie.
I was pretty sure that Tony wasn't going to kill him, but the tension in that scene was pretty high.
Did anyone else get creeped out a bit by Junior's side-kick? It was poor timing for such a character (young Asian man with serious rage issues) but I guess there's not much the producers could do since the show had already been shot. There were certainly a few scenes with that guy that sent chills down my spine.
jem88;1467679 said:It was a very solid, tense episode. However, I was talking to my wife about it, and the problem is this:
Last season was so full of anti-climaxes, moments where you were sure something big would happen, only for nothing at all to happen. So, with the Paulie on the boat scene, it was pretty predictable that Tony wouldn't actually take him out. I've always respected the show for not going for the easy shock, but occasionally you have to follow through on the tension; otherwise it becomes a case of cinematic blue balls.
As well with Junior's sidekick at the hospital. Interesting character and all, but it seems a little late in the day to be devoting that much time to a new, marginal character, when there are other plot threads/character arcs that deserve attention. Basically that kid received as much airtime in that one episode as Christopher has in the first 3 episodes combined. That doesn't seem right and it brings back disturbing memories of how much plot focus was devoted to Vito last year.
The first 5 seasons were excellent because they consistently introduced or featured characters that made life difficult for Tony and sent him to Melfi (who's been sadly under-represented in the last few years):
Season 1: Livia and Junior
Season 2: Richie Aprile
Season 3: Jackie Aprile and Ralphie Cifaretto
Season 4: Ralphie Cifaretto (Joe Pantalione was perfect in this role)
Season 5: Tony Blundetto, Jonny Sack, and Phil Leotardo
The last two installments have been lacking this. Phil Leotardo looked to be heading that way, but then nothing happened (see earlier note about anti-climaxes.) Who knows, maybe that whacking of the NYC boss will bring Phil back into play.
jem88;1467679 said:It was a very solid, tense episode. However, I was talking to my wife about it, and the problem is this:
Last season was so full of anti-climaxes, moments where you were sure something big would happen, only for nothing at all to happen. So, with the Paulie on the boat scene, it was pretty predictable that Tony wouldn't actually take him out. I've always respected the show for not going for the easy shock, but occasionally you have to follow through on the tension; otherwise it becomes a case of cinematic blue balls.
As well with Junior's sidekick at the hospital. Interesting character and all, but it seems a little late in the day to be devoting that much time to a new, marginal character, when there are other plot threads/character arcs that deserve attention. Basically that kid received as much airtime in that one episode as Christopher has in the first 3 episodes combined. That doesn't seem right and it brings back disturbing memories of how much plot focus was devoted to Vito last year.
The first 5 seasons were excellent because they consistently introduced or featured characters that made life difficult for Tony and sent him to Melfi (who's been sadly under-represented in the last few years):
Season 1: Livia and Junior
Season 2: Richie Aprile
Season 3: Jackie Aprile and Ralphie Cifaretto
Season 4: Ralphie Cifaretto (Joe Pantalione was perfect in this role)
Season 5: Tony Blundetto, Jonny Sack, and Phil Leotardo
The last two installments have been lacking this. Phil Leotardo looked to be heading that way, but then nothing happened (see earlier note about anti-climaxes.) Who knows, maybe that whacking of the NYC boss will bring Phil back into play.
jem88;1467679 said:As well with Junior's sidekick at the hospital. Interesting character and all, but it seems a little late in the day to be devoting that much time to a new, marginal character, when there are other plot threads/character arcs that deserve attention.
So, with the Paulie on the boat scene, it was pretty predictable that Tony wouldn't actually take him out. I've always respected the show for not going for the easy shock, but occasionally you have to follow through on the tension; otherwise it becomes a case of cinematic blue balls.
But the hospital scene with Phil Leotardo last season showed Tony going a bit soft. In and of itself, the scene was great. I just think I'm a touch jaded after last season. Still a great show.Doomsday;1467990 said:I dont think they were trying to develop a new character with the kid as much as they were trying to depict how pathetic Junior had become and how he is pretty much left to rout amongst the loonies.
It was pretty predictable but it only showed that Tony had great instincts to figure out the Paulie was the one who had been talking to Johnny and that maybe Tony had indeed gotten a touch softer after his recent stays in the hospital.
I can't imagine that the series has been the work of Christopher... it's too well written!jem88;1468545 said:But the hospital scene with Phil Leotardo last season showed Tony going a bit soft. In and of itself, the scene was great. I just think I'm a touch jaded after last season. Still a great show.
My wife and I are working through season 2 again. Now that was a mind-blowing season.
Something interesting occurred to me: It has been speculated on here that the whole series is in fact a screenplay written by Christopher. While I sincerely hope that isn't true (and I don't imagine it will be the case), I noticed something on the episode where Paulie goes to the psychic.
The psychic asks him about the poison ivy and if it still itches, basically invoking the ghost of Mikey Palmice. Now the only living person who was with Paulie at the time of the whacking was Christopher.
The psychic scene always seemed strange to me- David Chase might be a big fan of dreams, but his writing style doesn't seem to incorporate the supernatural (not like Lost for example.)
So the psychic thing always struck me as being a bit out of place. However, if in fact the whole series is a figment of Christopher's imagination, the same imagination responsible for Cleaver, then that would explain the scene.
A wildly speculative theory and probably more testament to the amount of free time I have on my hands these days than anything else, but still...
True enough! I'd be really disappointed if they went that way. But with David Chase, you really never know....Danny White;1468555 said:I can't imagine that the series has been the work of Christopher... it's too well written!
I can see Chrissy producing Cleaver... but not The Sopranos.
Danny White;1468555 said:I can't imagine that the series has been the work of Christopher... it's too well written!
I can see Chrissy producing Cleaver... but not The Sopranos.
Danny White;1469518 said:If you go back and watch season 1, though, the story seems to be being told from Tony's point of view. We're getting a look into his mind and soul and emotions.
I hope to heck it isn't a "movie" or a "story" or a "dream" or some nonsense like that. Just keep everything at face value and end it.