I'm sure you read Playboy for the articles, tooWell the face is part of the package.
No way...I'll take zeke over dak any day of the week and twice in sundayIf we thought he was gonna be this good we would've taken him at 4.
Zeke> BosaZeke is great all the way around but I still pine for Bosa. A little. They're both just so darn good you can't go wrong.
Agreed. I'm glad we have Zeke, but I don't think a team could go wrong with either.Zeke is great all the way around but I still pine for Bosa. A little. They're both just so darn good you can't go wrong.
I sure was surprised how bosa played. He was earning his spotHe showed flashes of being real good. Compared to DAK he is a scrub though. I think Bosa is better than Wentz.
Is occasionally playing well, enough to get traded up for at the #2 spot? lol
I mean, I'm not saying he won't be a good QB eventually, but if this redraft is based on last season, I don't get the reasoning.
I sure was surprised how bosa played. He was earning his spot
I'm sure you read Playboy for the articles, too
I t looks like I may have under rated Bosa. I really thought he might be a bust waiting to happen. I still think he is an ******* based on his holdout, but based on performance alone he looks worthy of where he was taken .... so far.
so Garrett has received the equivalent of 4 first rounders (3 low) in the last 2 years and the best oline in football and he still cant win 1 playoff game
Who said Wentz would match Dak?Dak had arguably the best rookie season ever for a QB and held off a veteran QB that was top 5 at his position as recently as 2014. The chances are slim that Wentz could have matched Dak's success if he were on Cowboys. That's just how good Dak's season was. The most likely scenario would have been Wentz being replaced by Romo after he returned from injury.
If Dak had been on Philly's roster last year, there's a good chance he would have had a better season than Wentz. Dak was used to playing with lesser talent at Mississippi State. Wentz played for a team in college that was generally more talented than its competition. So playing with less talent would likely have been easier for Dak than Wentz in year one.
Yep, it shows you how important defense is.
And it shows the fallacy of "all in" because any game can be decided on a play or two that knocks you out.
the team came out flat and unorganized. That's 100% on the coach. That 1st half was the worst playoff game I've seen them play
I can only blame the coaching staff so much.
The players have to play.
When "fans" use that excuse I just laugh at their inability to judge football playersExactly. Playing for the Rams wouldn't suddenly take away Dak's accuracy, decision making, leadership or off the charts poise. Would he have been as good? It's impossible to know, but Dak's biggest strengths, IMO, largely aren't a product of those around him.
agree but when your coach is sending 13 men into the huddle, under-utilizing his RB (somebody please tell me why Dunbar is over Zeke on 3rd down), failing to test the other teams weak/injured secondary quickly and often its the coaching.
Coaching I agree but not for that reason, for not having the balls and starting Romo. And letting the media annoint dak presscott from 4th round talent to supreme leader and all world talent. As If having 3 all pro lineman, NFL leading rusher, best dallas TE all time and Dez Bryant we all know what he is capable of Pfft well that worked out, 1 and done just like Tony years ago...smhagree but when your coach is sending 13 men into the huddle, under-utilizing his RB (somebody please tell me why Dunbar is over Zeke on 3rd down), failing to test the other teams weak/injured secondary quickly and often its the coaching.
agree but when your coach is sending 13 men into the huddle, under-utilizing his RB (somebody please tell me why Dunbar is over Zeke on 3rd down), failing to test the other teams weak/injured secondary quickly and often its the coaching.