- Messages
- 58,971
- Reaction score
- 60,826
dadymat;3030372 said:oh...thats harsh
'Harsh' isn't the word I'd use. But based on his posts, is anyone surprised that he username is sophomoric?
dadymat;3030372 said:oh...thats harsh
Ozzu;3030382 said:Yes indeedy.
Nav22;3029818 said:But he's 0-2 in the playoffs and wears his hat backwards. Cut the bum. Pro Bowl QBs are easy to replace.
Yes sir, and I changed it to that for him when Henson was released. I had no idea what it meant or I never would have. I was a fireman. I found dead bodies on more than one occasion. My cousin lost a husband and infant in a fire. I think it is tasteless and he knows that. He doesn't care. So I try and avoid his posts.theebs;3030378 said:Seriously? that is what that stands for?
How can people even ask this? Because of his gambling style of play.McCordsville Cowboy;3030375 said:Why does the immortal favre get compared to the very mortal Romo constantly. Is is their height?
Its not their arms, playoff wins or superbowl rings.
Reckless play I guess, except you can get away with it when you have some league clout.
BAT;3029883 said:otherwise they would remember the Hogebooms
Hook'em#11;3029839 said:And he has a Super Bowl ring. Amazing how everything is good once you win one of those.
Maybe Tony will get one, maybe not. He is still better then most in the NFL and is the best option for the Cowboys Now.
THUMPER;3030480 said:Kind of interesting to note that the Jets' defense was #1 in 1968 (in the AFL) and they had 2 PB WRs in George Sauer and Don Maynard. Namath completed fewer than 50% of his passes that year and threw 2 more INTs than TDs.
They say that defense wins championships and they are right. Until our defense steps up and plays well in big games we won't win a SB regardless of who our QB is. Romo is a very good QB and could be great if we can get our defense to play 60 minutes of every game.
USMarineVet;3030311 said:I never said any such thing. Now you're putting words in my mouth. I merely stated it was good to see a post showing all the good things that Romo has achieved in his young career; ranking him among the all-time greats at this point.
What does your post prove? Does it show all the plays called back cause our offensive line can't seem to remember the snap count? Or the balls he's had to rush scrambling cause he hasn't had the protection say a Peyton Manning or a Tom Brady get? What about the ball that Crayton stutter-stepped on that was RIGHT THERE! Do you think that would erase the "Tony hasn't won a playoff game yet" threads? Or the slick ball that went through his hands that should have beat Seattle? You betcha. Romo's fault? Eh.. yeah I guess.. But doesn't reflect on his ability to quarterback and lead this team.
Dude, it takes 53 players to win or lose a game. Putting it all on Romo is just an easy way to assign the blame. Fact is, it's the fault of Jerry Jones all the way down to the kicker, and then you mix in a bad break here and there. You have a very narrow-minded approach to what's happened to this team.
wileedog;3030079 said:Because clearly Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark would have simply sucked with Payton Manning.
Good thing Owens is so busy elevating Edwards to Canton...
Kilyin;3029906 said:I think juckie drank a lot of arsenic as a child.
USMarineVet;3030501 said:If we get our defense to play 60 minutes of every game, we're in a whole lotta trouble.
:laugh2:
Kilyin;3029986 said:TO isn't getting in the HOF on a first ballot, if he gets in at all.
jorgemarcos;3030705 said:I also remember Eli driving the giants to a TD in the final seconds of the 2nd quarter. We dominated all the half, but our defense let Eli score easily in a matter of seconds. Is that also Romo's fault?
jobberone;3030684 said:You have hate on your shirt.