Kevinicus
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 19,916
- Reaction score
- 12,706
they had acting in TFA? sorry, but outside harrison ford, this series never really has been about quality actors. take out corvette summer and some movie where hammell is again skywalker what else has he done? fisher? not to knock the originals, for what they were i loved 'em. opening day of return of the jedi it was my high school grad present to go to dallas and sit in line overnight to watch the first days viewing. that was so incredible.
i have a "mock" revenge of the jedi poster hanging up in my movie room.
however, i saw no reason to call this VII when it's nothing more than a dressed up IV.
i see no reason to call it a 9 part series anymore when you have completely changed the original concept.
this isn't to say i dug what lucas did in 1-3. those sucked in epic proportions and i have zero desire to go back and watch them again. VII is up there with them.
this also isn't to say the acting in independence day was the same, but i get what he's saying here. the whole movie seems like a lot of parts loosely joined together to start history over again.
let me ask you this - take away all other star wars movies. gone. poof. whisper in the wind gone. would *this* star wars movie done anywhere near what it has done? would you feel the same way about the story if this was the only one out there? they made it like a reboot, so make it stand on it's own?
did it?
no. not to me.
so i know full well i'm in the minority, but put me down as this just not making sense.
I look at it as a sequel not a reboot. It relies heavily in the OT, but that is not a problem to me. SW movies have always repeated ideas.
I also think a lot of it has to do with trying to restore goodwill with the fans after all the damage done by the prequels.
TFA definitely had some quality performances. Much more so than older Star Wars movies (as you seem to agree the acting in them was less than stellar).
If you take away all the other movies, of course this wouldn't do as well, and people wouldn't feel the same. A good chunk has to do with Han, and what was established before. I have no problems with sequels tieing into, and relying on, their predecessors and not standing on their own without them. Take away all but Empire (widely considered the best) and you have a movie that doesn't stand on it's own either.
I don't see how you can say it is just iv and then say the original concept is completely changed. That is a complete contradiction.
Is the film flawed? Yes. More so than any other SW? No.