Adreme
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,070
- Reaction score
- 3,889
No, I'm not arguing...just presenting facts. You attempt merely to present an abstract to not focus on the truth. Anything less than full application, is based upon a make believe rule of abstract dominance. Not in the NFL and with the amounts of salaries today. That would truly be the chaos at it's finest. The NFL is completely dependent upon TV revenues to even exist now. Make believe teams? No, pay for what one gets...as to an argument, just go ahead and start one, or discuss counter points for what is presented. A book of special cases doesn't invalidate the real principals involved.
You here and now saying that team scouts and organizations DON'T know what real values for players are? You don't even address values with a stance that players don't also have to earn top money.
You aren't being real here...good night, play with someone else's time now.
You are not arguing facts. Your facts only work if every NFL player got to renegotiate their salary every year or the cap never changed.
Are you really going to argue any of those players are the best at their positions, even among those getting second contracts? Even scouts and front office people know they are not, but your value is based around a scenario that does not exist in the NFL.
Your determination to crate every imaginary scenario that ignores the reality of the history of the NFL since free agency means you are not really interested in a fact based conversation so I will step away knowing I spent time talking to someone about economics who does not understand economics.