_sturt_
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,054
- Reaction score
- 3,928
Here's a maybe stupid question, so forgive me bein stupid on this point... worse, stupid and too lazy to look it up... but in the NBA, of course, there is an ultimate limitation on contracts to just 5 years, but none in baseball, and as far as I've known, none in football.
But now we have a new CBA, of course... is there anything in there that sets a maximum length?
I say that, even as I feel almost lock-certain that, the untold story is that the agreement is done, but that both parties have also agreed to wait until July in case there would be other developments in the course of two months time that would have some implications.
In other words, my opinion is that there is no actual consequential dispute at this point at all... money or years.
But if we assume they are indeed deadlocked, it would be intriguing to know if the parties could conceivably meet somewhere upstream of the 4/5 years mark, and instead agree to cross the stream at 8 or 9 or 10 years, ie, a significantly longer deal where, ostensibly, both obligate themselves to greater risks.
But now we have a new CBA, of course... is there anything in there that sets a maximum length?
I say that, even as I feel almost lock-certain that, the untold story is that the agreement is done, but that both parties have also agreed to wait until July in case there would be other developments in the course of two months time that would have some implications.
In other words, my opinion is that there is no actual consequential dispute at this point at all... money or years.
But if we assume they are indeed deadlocked, it would be intriguing to know if the parties could conceivably meet somewhere upstream of the 4/5 years mark, and instead agree to cross the stream at 8 or 9 or 10 years, ie, a significantly longer deal where, ostensibly, both obligate themselves to greater risks.