So you would have fired Jimmy in 1989?
You don't have to answer. I know you would. You're far too impulsive.
Which year as HC was that for Jimmy?
Which year us this as HC for Garett with a team he has "built"
I'll wait for your answer
No excuses, just the answer
It's irrelevant. I don't care whether it was Year 1 or Year 5. Anyone who can't look at the context of this losing streak is really really out of touch.
"Irrelevant"?
Because it suits your agenda
The context is that many other NFL teams have won games with back up QBs this year and do so every year
They don't just give up
When has Dallas "given up" in any of the 5 games? Yeah, they haven't.
It's irrelevant because the same people who want Garrett gone now wanted him gone in year 1. That's what you call an agenda.
So you would have fired Jimmy in 1989?
You don't have to answer. I know you would. You're far too impulsive.
It's irrelevant. I don't care whether it was Year 1 or Year 5. Anyone who can't look at the context of this losing streak is really really out of touch.
Stick your head out a little further, Jason.
Where is a tunnel when you need one!
So you would have fired Jimmy in 1989?
You don't have to answer. I know you would. You're far too impulsive.
Just imagine if these same cast of characters were doing this for 20 years, Stephen.
No Stephen
You and your father thinking you are "football people " is unacceptable
False comparison, I think.So you would have fired Jimmy in 1989?
You don't have to answer. I know you would. You're far too impulsive.
That's pretty disingenuous, in sports and any other pursuit.It's irrelevant. I don't care whether it was Year 1 or Year 5.
Dave Campo never had to play with stinky QBs....
OH WAIT!
Not only is it acceptable, it's reality. If you're unwilling to accept reality, then aren't you insane by definition?
To call this unacceptable suggests they are willing to fire Garrett, which they are not, so stop talking tough.