btcutter
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,309
- Reaction score
- 2,584
Doubt he even last till our pick in the 2nd. This injury probably drop him to bottom of 1st or top of 2nd IMO.I'd grab him in the 3rd but not before.
Doubt he even last till our pick in the 2nd. This injury probably drop him to bottom of 1st or top of 2nd IMO.I'd grab him in the 3rd but not before.
Doubt he even last till our pick in the 2nd. This injury probably drop him to bottom of 1st or top of 2nd IMO.
he sucked already.... that might...drop him to the third round.I know I wouldn't touch him. has bust written all over him.Big blow to his draft stock.
So let's assume he is like Lawson.I still like him at 28.
So 5-6 months puts him at July/August. If he grades out high by our scouts, why wouldn't he still be in play at 28, or a trade down to top of 2nd round? Yes, he misses the offseason. But can still run. And I assume, will be able to start lifting in 3-4 months.
So let's assume he is like Lawson.
Ten games, one start, thirteen tackles and two sacks is what to reasonably expect if the two are equal. All in all, he played less than 300 snaps because his shoulder issue lingered.
I don't see the value at 28.
Why does he have bust written all over him? I'm not trying to be a jerk, I like the guy's physical tools so I want to know what the reservations are.he sucked already.... that might...drop him to the third round.I know I wouldn't touch him. has bust written all over him.
It also depends on where he is on our board, if he has a first round grade then we know the FO will take that risk at 28.It's easy to not see the value when you assume that he won't contribute.
In truth, we have no idea what he will or won't contribute. At 28 though, I'd say this guy is worth the gamble
It also depends on where he is on our board, if he has a first round grade then we know the FO will take that risk at 28.
August/September. He's not getting the surgery until after the combine in March.
So we draft to stash pass rush talent to be fresh in the playoffs? We are that good, huh?By playoff time, he'll be fresh and ready.
Why does he have bust written all over him? I'm not trying to be a jerk, I like the guy's physical tools so I want to know what the reservations are.
See I don't care about 40 (and I bet he grades well there anyway). The guy has long arms, good burst and a non-stop motor. His hand placement and technique is raw, but that's one of the easier things to develop. I wouldn't be shocked if his upper body strength were subpar, but that's also something he can develop. I don't doubt the guy is raw, but he has some tools and non-stop motor guys are the ones who improve because they aren't afraid to work at it. I don't care how tall he is, Dwight Freeney is only 6-1. Takk is a long strider with long arms, who has good change of direction. Those are transferrable characteristics.6'1....270LBS.
http://www.uclabruins.com/roster.aspx?rp_id=4196
Word has it his combines numbers (height/weight) are gonna show his listed stats are a lie.
Way too short to be a DE. Not big enough to be a DT. Isn't a quick twitch athlete. Wouldn't be shocked to see his weight room #'s to be lacking as well. A true DE will put up 225...over 20 times. I bet he barely puts up over 15. We will see.
For an OLB/DE...his 40 time is gonna be important. He better run a 4.75 or better....I'll be shocked if he is even close to that.