ABQCOWBOY
Regular Joe....
- Messages
- 58,929
- Reaction score
- 27,716
From how I’ve heard it, DLaw said don’t tag me (as you told me you wouldn’t) and before the tag deadline he was agreeable to $20 million per (guaranteed I don’t know). Then he got tagged cutting him off from FA. Once he was kept from FA by their move and unable to see what his market was the team suddenly thought $20 million was fine now. It’s logical he’d assume the team thought it would be higher than the $20 million if he made FA or they would have kept their offer lower. So if I get cut off from seeing my number in the market, and I was told one thing and had another done to me (tag) as far as I saw it, and I see Flowers (a much worse player in my mind) get $58 million guaranteed, then I’m reassessing my number to the organization and coming back at a higher number. Also the shoulder is his only leverage for getting something done now so he doesn’t miss time. If the Cowboys can’t see how their dealings in this can be construed by the player as less than honest and the player now feels like he’s got to play hardball to be fair to himself and his people, they are fools. I have no problem with how DLaw is responding to the organization’s moves.
His agent already knows what he can get on the open market. None of this is relative IMO. The organization had to tag him to secure his rights. It would have been beyond stupid not to do that. He's doing what he thinks is the right thing to do to make his money. The team is doing what they believe is best for the team. It is what it is but I will also say that DLaw turned down a long term contract last year as well. It's not as if the team didn't want to sign him. The same thing that is happening now happened then. Right or wrong, the book on this has always been one of the Cowboys believing he is worth X and he believing he is worth Y.