DIAF;3940986 said:
Yeah, many outstanding pitchers started with those very same traits...when they were 18 or 19 years old. Ogando is 27.
First, you are talking about guys that started out in a ML farms system at an early age, and Ogando didn't have that opportunity - second, you are talking about guys who took 3-4 years to become major league players, sometimes longer to become quality ML players, and Ogando only took 2 months - and third, in an earlier post i gave the example of several pitchers who didn't get their control down and perfect multiple pitches until they were well into their major league careers. Again, if you pay attention you will note that there are many cases of pitchers not getting it together intil their mid to late 20's, even with the benefit of a full minor league development period, which, again, Ogando did not have.
DIAF;3940986 said:
nyc was talking about CJ, not me. CJ Wilson throws something like 5 pitches. And there's a LOT of difference between a low 90s fastball and a 97mph fastball.
You do realize that C.J wasn't considered a starter until last year, and he was only reluctantly given the chance to do so then. You keep claiming that early assessments of players are so significant, yet when you are faced with the fact that players aren't actually locked into an early assessement then suddenly that doesn't matter so much. I guess early assessments only apply to player4s you can use to support your point, but are meaningless with players that don't support your point.
And yes, there is a LOT of difference between a low 90's fastball and a 97 mph fastball - and Ogando is the one that can throw the 97 mph fastball, so I'm wondering how you think this comments supports your point.
DIAF;3940986 said:
So you think you know more as a fan than professional scouts and coaches?
Again, I trust the professional opinion of major league scouts and coaches and personnel departments more than my own, or those of other fans. If we knew as much as they did, we'd be scouts and coaches and personnel men.
Let me ask you this - why is it that you trust scouts and coaches making an assessment of a player before he has had a chance to develop. but you do not trust these same coaches to make an assessment after the player starts to develop. That kind of makes your argument look prestty silly to me.
As for me, no, I don't think I do know more than they do, which is why I trust them to make decisons on how to proceed with a players career as it progresses. Again, I find it funny that you believe a coach can make a set in stone assessment of a player's future before he has a chance to mature, learn and grown, but a coach cannot make a fair assessment of a player's potential after he starts to mature and learn and grow.
And, of course, I still find it ironic that you can completely ignore the fact that hostory has proven that players are not locked into a projection early in their minor league development. To continue to do that is to profess ignorance of what the entire minor league system is all about.
DIAF;3940986 said:
Oh, thanks for telling me that players evolve. I had always wondered what those minor leagues were for! Now I know!
You have continually ignored that it occurs, and in fact have continually suggested that players cannot evolve beyond what some scout or coach initically projected, so it's pretty clear you either weren't aware, or just chose to ignore it to suit your purpose.
DIAF;3940986 said:
One of the players we are talking about here (Matt Harrison) is already 25, has been in the majors for most of 4 seasons now, and has 6 years of minor league experience where he showed that he was not a big strikeout pitcher, was a hittable finesse lefty. He's been developing for 8 or 9 years now. I think they've got good idea about him already. He's mostly finished with his evolving. Is it possible for a player to suddenly become great at age 25/26 after not showing much of that kind of ability the 8 years previous? Sure. Likely? No.
And Harrison may not make it as a starter - I told you all along that I was skeptical about him myself. All I said was that there was reason for optimism. Developing into a major league quality pitcher isn't restricted to guys who do so before 25 - there are an infinite number of pitchers -and position players for that matter - that don't hit their stride until mid to late 20's.
Of course it's not always likely, but my point has never been that every pitcher WILL develop, but rather that it makes no sense to condemn them before we are certain, and especially at a point when they are performing well. When you do that you are ignoring that players can develop, which goes completely against the time proven history of MLB. That's what you have done with Harrison and Ogando.
DIAF;3940986 said:
As mentioned before, Ogando's 27. He's not young. He's already matured physically. He's been a pitcher now for 5 years playing winter ball, Dominican Leagues, and any International tournament the Rangers could get him in to. Its not like the first time the Rangers have seen him was the second he stepped off the plane.
And, again, as mentioned before, this is a pointless statement because being able to watch him in the Dominican says nothing at all about what they felt he could do once he got to the United States.
What does speak volumes about what the Rangers felt he could do in the United States is that they put him on the fast track to the majors as soon as he stepped of the plane, so I'm baffled at what you think this argument (?) does to support your point. The Rangers felt confident enough to promote him to the majors after only 2 moths of minor league ball, and felt confident enough to use him as a key bullpen pitcher in his very first year in the United States, and felt confdent enough to give him a shot to start this year.
You seem to be suggesting that despite seeing Ogando pitch for several years in the Dominican Republic the Rangers are still unsure about him, which is completely the opposite of what the facts show. They have rushed him into the majors faster than any pitcher the orgainization has had since David Clyde, and that's because they knew that with his talent and maturity level he was capable of doing it, not because they felt he was a limited prospect as you keep suggesting.