DandyDon1722
It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
- Messages
- 6,397
- Reaction score
- 7,019
You mean they don't offer to waive it?
Yeah, that's what I've read. Still though, it's hard to defend Bosa here.
You mean they don't offer to waive it?
The agency that represents him asks for the same thing for all of their clients.
They have gotten it from all of them except for the Chargers.
I'm sure they are worried if they give in now, then that's it.
Dealings like this normally are not specifically the players asking for this or that. it is the agency representing him
Now, I guess he could fire his agency...not sure what the penalty would be though.
fixed it.
I think I already said that. He can dump them if he wants. They work for him.The agency works for Bosa. If Bosa wanted to be practicing and playing he would be.
To be fair... all the top 3 picks have either offset language OR deferred signing bonus...SD wants both and they do that for every contract including Rivers and Gates.....they won't bend for a rookieYou don't know that for sure. Again, the conditions Bosa was asking for were in both Wentz's and Elliott's contracts per ESPN. So the question is, would Jerry or the Eagles bent on the Bosa demands?
To be fair... all the top 3 picks have either offset language OR deferred signing bonus...SD wants both and they do that for every contract including Rivers and Gates.....they won't bend for a rookie
To be fair... all the top 3 picks have either offset language OR deferred signing bonus...SD wants both and they do that for every contract including Rivers and Gates.....they won't bend for a rookie
I read that every top 3 pick since the new CBA has one or the other but not both......either way they aren't worth fighting a war over......he would still get 18m of his entire 26m contract by March of next year, 10m at signing........EE deferred 40% of his signing bonus at #4According to ESPN, that's not true. Wentz has both the deferment and offset language in his contract. As does Elliott (granted he was the #4 pick). ESPN certainly could be wrong.
I read that every top 3 pick since the new CBA has one or the other but not both......either way they aren't worth fighting a war over......he would still get 18m of his entire 26m contract by March of next year, 10m at signing........EE deferred 40% of his signing bonus at #4
To be fair... all the top 3 picks have either offset language OR deferred signing bonus...SD wants both and they do that for every contract including Rivers and Gates.....they won't bend for a rookie
This guy is something else. The chargers ocfered him a contract that would given him the 2nd most cash yr one amongst rookies. And he rejected. This guy is a idiot.
The former. His mother suggested Bozo do an "Eli Manning", bloke.Does he just not want to play there? Or is all about money with him?
I disagree....get your butt to camp rookie......his Dad was a 1st holdout back in the 80s and turned out to be a huge bust.....SD is offering the years, the money and it is 100% guaranteed.......if they want offsets and a deferment, so what...Doesn't make Bosa in the wrong here. In fact this is just another scumbag move in the history of Spanos
This guy is something else. The chargers ocfered him a contract that would given him the 2nd most cash yr one amongst rookies. And he rejected. This guy is a idiot.
Bozo is a good player. Zeke is franchise.This guy is something else. The chargers ocfered him a contract that would given him the 2nd most cash yr one amongst rookies. And he rejected. This guy is a idiot.
their conditions are the standard language.......waiving it for top 3 picks has become the new thing.....SD doesn't want to give a rookie something they wouldn't give Rivers or GatesThey have some really non-standard conditions on it.