If we were going to call a time out why not challenge the catch by Dez anyway? I just don't get that. He clearly made the catch and started to run with the ball. What do you guys think?
one bad football team beat another bad football team....that about sums it up!
It was not a catch, no matter how much you guys want it to be. You have to control the ball all the way through the process unless you made a "football move" and secured posession before hitting the ground (which he did not)
Can't challenge under 2 mins but it was clearly a catch. Always had control and took a few steps.
He took at least two steps after the catch and kept control until after he hit the ground.
What really made me mad was the fact that it was originally ruled a catch, and then the refs changed their minds. Amazing.
We need an explanation as to why they didn't review that play....
why didn't the booth look at it?
one bad football team beat another bad football team....that about sums it up!
It was not a catch, no matter how much you guys want it to be. You have to control the ball all the way through the process unless you made a "football move" and secured posession before hitting the ground (which he did not)
If he took 3 steps with possession through those 3 steps then you're right. Id have to rewatch itif he took three steps after making the catch, then controlling the ball thru the process does not apply.
I'm not buying that crap. I counted three steps before he went to the ground so all this controlling to the ground didn't matter. The ball was possessed.