Your entire post was nothing but revisionist nonsense from a pro-Garrett excuse-maker. With the nerve to "roll their eyes" at anyone else.
"Becomes head coach". A position he was given, never earned.
"Cuts all old pricey veterans". You mean
his offensive linemen? The guys he had no problem having here when he was the offensive coordinator?
"Rebuilds offensive line". Yeah, the "Garrett Master Plan". The ultimate in revisionist history. As if the plan was to use multiple first round picks to repair the line. As if the great Garrett forced the rest of the organization to go this route. As if the plan all along was to draft Smith, Frederick, and Martin, despite the fact that they traded down before they drafted Frederick, and wanted three players before they settled for Zack Martin. But yeah, 'Garrett Master Plan'!
"Starts to rebuild defense". Great job of that. 5-plus years into 'the process', and this part is 'started'? The Romans took less time to build the Colosseum. But I'm sure the blame for that will shift elsewhere. Garrett only gets credit.
"One year removed from 12-4 season". Actually, he's two years removed. His most recent report card shows a 4-12 record and a grade of "F".
I find it hilarious that someone attempting to defend a .500 coach has the complete lack of self-awareness and ignorance to "roll their eyes" at anyone.