why pay pollard 10mil and then draft high rb and call Pollard "not that guy". sounds like they should have not retained him.. odd, this board many fans wanted to call pollard RB1 ie "he derves it" hes better then zeke..zekes now gone , "pollards not that guy "
so, the FO made mistake keeping pollard at 10mil should ahgve let him seek offers if im reading this board correctly now. zeke was always Rb1 when healthy this proves it.. everyone worried about the rb positions now that zekes gone yet pollard, malik, jones all on this roster..
if rb can be easily replaced aren't we set? grab back in the 4th and lets go..lol
lastly, gibbs called himself a jamal charles type said hes closer to a Cmac type doesn't sound lie big 25carry back you take int he first , BR is closer to that guy but why not wait until the 4tgh for roshan Johnson or bigger back like him to pair with Plalrd ..you take back now in the first that pollard signing is horrible.
you dont pay a back 10mil to be the #2 or to split carries evenly.
the more we used TP he ended up last 6 game 4 RS and 2 Playoff games he averaged 3.8 YPC, zero tds, 51YPG , and got hurt twice and had surgery to end his season..FT seemed like the right moved cant lose schultz and pollard off this offense but thinking now, he should have been offered 6mil or let walk., hes a change of pace back that needs to share the RBBC