xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 56,968
- Reaction score
- 64,431
Honestly, I don't feel so confident about Dallas' chances of winning even if the Dez catch stood. Say Dallas takes a 27-26 or 29-26 lead, assuming that the Dez catch led to a follow-up Cowboys touchdown. Then you have Aaron Rodgers, one of the best quarterbacks in all of football, driving the Packers downfield against a Cowboys defense that could usually be counted on to fold and collapse when it mattered most.
End result, probably a 33-29 Packers victory or something.
Just to recap the details:
The score was 21-26 at the time of the no-catch.
The play:
4th & 2
Romo to Dez. Dez down at GB 1, (31 yards) - Call Reversed, No-Catch.
Time remaining 4:42
Dez lost the ball because he reached for the goal-line.
- He had the 1st down. Ball security (making certain it was a catch) was WAY more important than scoring at TD.
- Catching it but not scoring a TD would have been better than scoring a TD (burn more clock).
- GB had 1 timeout remaining.
They could have burned some time off the clock if he had just gone down instead of reaching for the goal-line.
The 2-point conversion would have been a huge play; otherwise, a GB FG put them ahead.