Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 55,386
- Reaction score
- 36,558
YepAnd add Tannehill's games against NE and BAL.
On the other side is KC and Mahomes.
Both serve to show us that there are different ways to go about building a true contender but both have the same thing in common, there must be a blueprint, a plan to build by.
One final four team had an elite QB and won and the other lost with the other two teams with mid tier QB's like Prescott.
But what team is more likely to remain a contender for years to come?
I’d argue the Chiefs with Mahomes much like the Packers have been with Rodgers reaching their 5th championship game with Aaron in the conversation every year despite his supporting cast.
Narrowing the argument to only winning championships is an attempt to lessen the importance of having an Elite QB. Because without one your window isn’t going to open as long because the Cap will shred apart whatever supporting cast you surround a lesser QB with especially after you pay them.
The best window to win a championship with a less than Elite QB is on their Rookie contract. Or a defense before you have to pay everyone.