Hennessy_King
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 16,636
- Reaction score
- 25,426
Ware had a Hall of Fame QB on that team.Ware and his Super Bowl ring say hi.
Ware had a Hall of Fame QB on that team.Ware and his Super Bowl ring say hi.
Ware and his Super Bowl ring say hi.
Marino listened to only himself and wouldn't run the ball the way he should. Marino was his own worst enemyPartially but was it Marino’s also?
Or Finkle?
That Super Bowl was won by the defense, not the QBWare had a Hall of Fame QB on that team.
The HOF QB did what he had to do to not mess it up. Sometimes that's what winning football is about. Separates the greats from not so greats.That Super Bowl was won by the defense, not the QB
Also puts the performance on par with Flacco.The HOF QB did what he had to do to not mess it up. Sometimes that's what winning football is about. Separates the greats from not so greats.
That is such a stupid argument. Dez bobbled the ball when it hit the turf and it is on Romo - it is just stupid!
What if Beasley had pulled a Crayton - we will never know! Crayton had the easy catch in the world across the middle and dropped it.
You're playing stupid.
Yup sometimes just doing your job like converting a 4th and 2 instead of a deep td throw to be a hero is the right thing to do.Also puts the performance on par with Flacco.
Truth stings don't it.
A first down keeps the drive alive.
A 5 yard slant is easier to catch than a 25 yard deep sideline prayer.
A first down keeps the possession alive and takes time off the clock.
Romo went for the the hero shot with almost 5 minutes on the clock.
I have no problem with that play in the final minute of a game.
In that situation, even if Dez does not drop it and you score,
you give the ball back to Rodgers with 4 minutes on the clock.
Not smart.
I thought the same thing for years.
2014 team had a shot, but a slight one. We will never know thanks to that stupid no catch call!!!!!
Copy! ,,,while yer' perspective is of sound reason,,,yet,,,the selective variables to yer' narrative are not,,, Bro! you've two active duty Q.B'sI posted this a while back. Between D Brees, A Rodgers, B Favre and S Young they played a total of 52 years and won a super Bowl 4 times - that equates to a 7% chance of winning for 4 of the best QB's to ever play the game. Throw arguably one of the best passers ever into that mix who did not get a Super Bowl (Marino - 17 yrs) and the percentage chance goes down to 5.7% - 1 out of every 20 years!
Peyton Manning - considered by many as the best ever won 1 Sb in 13 years in his prime - 7.6%, and got another one with Denver that had very little to do with him, bringing up the percentage for him to 11.7%
So, what that shows to me is that no matter how good you are as a QB, you do not control getting to and winning the Super Bowl and even if you are great you may only have a 7% chance of winning 1.
Multiple Super Bowl QB winners had arguably some of the best teams/coaches in the history of the game (Brady, Aikman, Montana and Bradshaw for example)
That's my perspective
Truth stings don't it.
A first down keeps the drive alive.
A 5 yard slant is easier to catch than a 25 yard deep sideline prayer.
A first down keeps the possession alive and takes time off the clock.
Romo went for the the hero shot with almost 5 minutes on the clock.
I have no problem with that play in the final minute of a game.
In that situation, even if Dez does not drop it and you score,
you give the ball back to Rodgers with 4 minutes on the clock.
Not smart.
That is such a stupid argument. Dez bobbled the ball when it hit the turf and it is on Romo - it is just stupid! What if Beasley had pulled a Crayton - we will never know! Crayton had the easy catch in the world across the middle and dropped it.
Reading your post is like watching Pride and Prejudice! It takes great concentration to get the meaning!Copy! ,,,while yer' perspective is of sound reason,,,yet,,,the selective variables to yer' narrative are not,,, Bro! you've two active duty Q.B's
( still) proclaimed as being the "best to have ever played the game",,,and ,,,most certainly, this is a considerable point where I draw contention with in the "variable premise of the narratives perspective,that I reckon I'll just have to live with
* it's an admirable post by anyones definition my friend,,,but,,,I'm just saying that perhaps were the wording might have been " as of late recent recollection" compared to " Have ever played the game"?,,, ,,,you'd be ironclad& solid gold,BRO!
Was it Romo's fault for not being a greater QB than he was (which was pretty great)? No, of course not.Was that Romo's fault? Just curious... & very interested in your perspectives.
lol. no.Super bowl? Absolutely not. He always choked long before he got there.