Tony Romo was the starter...because Bledsoe sucked so bad. What aren't you understanding here?
Cousins won the job in a competion in camp. You can't be this dense?
Weeden was a guy who didn't play a game since the Cardinals game last season. Cassle has been with this system for month. Are you understanding now, nitwit?
WE DIDN'T LOSE HALF OUR STARTERS IN THE 90s WHEN AIKMAN WENT DOWN! Not comparable!
In 2 out of our 4 games without Romo, our D-Line was getting thin, we were without our starting WR, starting franchise QB. We then got our D-line back, and we faced a Patriots team that is now on pace to having a similar season to their 07 year. Still without our starting QB and starting WR. 2 key players were straight off their suspensions.
Against the Giants, we changed QBs to one who hasn't started a game since the beginning of 2014, has only been with us for a few weeks.
This isn't the same as a a QB winning out in camp.
Show me a team that has lost as many players as us and won games - I'll wait.
And honestly, if you're going to debate about this, don't bring up a damn team from the 90s that had trouble winning without their starting RB that was loaded with talent at nearly every other position. It's laughable and hardly even worthy of a response.