why take those away? you are coming up with this little box to qualify our justification. why take away the bounces? some of them were bad throws where the receiver reached back and the ball bounced.... that's a bad throw. and those late game desperations..... why were we in a desperate mode? and if we are mounting a come back, then he has to make plays, not interceptions.
I'm analyzing the player's performance.
If the WR caused the INT on a good pass then it's not the QBs fault.
If a QB is intercepted on a Hail Mary, there is no point including that INT when analyzing the QB.
There are many reasons a team can be down on the scoreboard and many of those reasons are not the QB.
If the team is down by 20 late in the game and the WRs are not getting open then the QB can be conservative and avoid INTs but also have no chance to win. In order to have a chance to win the QB must attempt to force the issue which means making passes to WRs that he would not make under most conditions. The probability of an INT is very high in these situations.
Dak is normally conservative in regards to avoiding INTs. If he didn't have INTs late in games that they losing by more than 1 score then I would worry that he could not get out of his conservative approach even when necessary.
I like to analyze players.
I'm not arguing with fans of another team that "my" QB is better than theirs.
I didn't predict either pre or post draft that Dak would be great which is something that motivates some people to be biased for or against players (see Broaddus-ing).
We're not in a debate of 1 Cowboys QB vs another (see Quincy vs Hutch).
Where I am biased is against people that make claims that are wrong.
Much of what has been said about Dak during/after the 2017 season has been wrong.
I've spent a lot of time this offseason reviewing games and stats. The more I analyze the more it becomes clear that Dak was better than I realized and that his supporting cast was worse than I realized.
The funniest thing is that the vast majority of Dak critics don't even know his true weaknesses. Most claim it's accuracy or arm strength which is not true. Some claim he panicks under pressure which is definitely not true.
It's the nature of the QB position. Most fans are not very knowledgeable; therefore QBs get most of the blame for losing and most of the accolades for winning.
Fans rarely ever blame WRs for bad routes or other mistakes that are not obvious from across a crowed room while drinking beer, BSing with their buddys, screwing with fantasy football apps and texting.
Joe Fan sees the ball come down somewhere other than right at the WR and he automatically blames the QB.