Apparently you don't follow the National Football League.
Philly won a Super Bowl without their left tackle, center, quarterback, and other starters.
Rodgers wins regularly with guys missing.
Romo used to do it frequently.
Pittsburgh lost Roethlisberger, Leveon Bell, and Antonio Brown, and they had the same record as Dallas before last night's game.
Brady's won multiple championships with shotty receiving corps and entirely different rosters.
Our quarterback needs perfection around him, or it turns into a crap show.
So, let's dump Dak, draft a SB winning quarterback, another Rodgers or Brady.
Simple!
The number of "sure fire" college quarterbacks that flopped in the NFL is many times the number of lesser quarterbacks who flourished. And do you think Brady has had a Garrett for a coach? Rothlisbergher won a SB with a quarterback rating of like 17, yeah he carried that team!
That's the choice we have - stick with Dak and hope the coaching improves, or take a shot at drafting the next Brady (a sixth rounder, you want the odds on a 6th round quarterback winning a SB, or six?).
Me I'd rather stick with Dak for another year or two, before we take a shot at this team drafting the next Rodgers, which oh by the way will require a 2-14 or such season, won't that be fun, while Zeke gets beat to pieces, T. Smith retires, Lee retires, and LVE or Jarwin or such leaves for another team?
No. We're stuck with Dak I believe, at least for another few years, whatever it brings...