Yes. I recall because that post was what I replied to you initially. In that post, you stated:
My question was driven by curiosity in determining what created an assumption no one blamed Jerry Jones for years decades of less-than-expected results on the morning of the wild card game. I took note of your GM comment but it was not my focus at that time.
I will now make it my focus since you have re-emphasized the reasoning concerning your GM comment. In my opinion, the organization has required a change at GM, starting at maximum, at the end of the 2002 season. I will not fault anyone for suggesting a change should have occurred before that. And while I 100% agree a different qualified general manager is a must, I cannot logically ignore Jones has not stepped down and replaced himself with one during the past 22 years.
Your own reasoning offers one reason why Jones has been a detriment to his own goals for all this time. He has a long history of retaining players 'too long' and purposefully doing so via questionable contractual negotiations.
You will get no argument from me that anything I think means anything to Jones. He is the owner and self-appointed president/general manager of an NFL franchise. Why should he care?
Me? It means everything to me. It began REALLY meaning something to me when the team began eroding in the late 1990's. It firmly became something totally meaningful to me witnessing three straight 5-11 seasons. It did not stop being completely meaningful to me through each sub .500 season. Each .500 season. Each winning regular season. Each playoff season that ended at or beneath the divisional round.
I would argue that you believe three back-to-back-to-back 12-5 seasons undermines any blame other fans should place on Jones' culpability in not managing his team closer to his own stated goals. If that is true, I would re-emphasize that you are wrong. Or that your reasoning is wrong in my case at least.
I do not look at ANY organization of any kind in any field and say, "Oh well. Management is not to blame for substandard results." That ain't me. I certainty do not isolate Jones (or his DNA kids) from my lifelong opinion all organizations, successful or not, are parts of a whole. And I do believe decision-making by managers, especially top management, has tangible and intangible effects, both good and bad, on their organizations from top-to-bottom.
My opinion? My unchanged opinion? Jerral Wayne Jones Sr. has been a negative influence via his football management of his own team since March 29, 1994. His unqualified football management was initially offset by the roster quality and discipline embedded by Jimmy Johnson for a couple more seasons after Johnson's departure. Jones' inflexibly selfish sense of football management has contributed to his team not being comprised with the right combination of coaches and players--combinations that might be possible with the vision of a different qualified general manager.