MoistMayonnaise
Devil's Advocate
- Messages
- 4,885
- Reaction score
- 9,196
They could get Cooper's replacement at any time, WR is the deepest position in the draft.
That is funny.
They could get Cooper's replacement at any time, WR is the deepest position in the draft.
I looked back at our Defensive drafts over the past 15 years...since 2005 we have picked one defensive player we could call impactful (Lawrence), one good player in Jones (we let him walk), the rest have been ho hum, big risk, injury prone players we gambled on. and that's 65 picks in the 15 years...He is an enticing pick but with all of the media pointing fingers at the D, they will go D. Under this GM's watch, this team just had the worst D in their history and that is going to be echoing until April.
Lamb was a mistake?Yes, it was a mistake because it was all for flash and splash while bobbing around on the ocean, it was a pick for applause. It was all luxury for a team deep in needs.
The case some make is the value of Lamb at 17. Was he not a value at 16, 15, 14, 13? Why did those GM's pass on him? Because they're GM's with their jobs on the line to improve the team, not take a bow for a draft pick.
Another case is what D player was worth that pick? Chaisson? The answer is any D player that could help the worst D in the league and worst in Cowboys history. He didn't have to be a world beater, just a player they could count on to be 1 of the 11.
1 of 11. How many do they have now? If they'd used that on a D player, might they be closer than they are now? And what if he doesn't work out? Then they'd know and keep going back to the well.
I saw all of the celebrating here when they took Lamb and few asking why was he available? Partly because most GM's were trying to fill needs and partly because they didn't have him at 6th on their board.
He was the Cowboys first pick and led them in drops and was 2nd in the league in drops but his fans here will make excuses for him. And WR is the most plentiful position in the league.
This draft should be the easiest for the Cowboys, if they go D as they should have last year. Their needs are plenty and the only position they don't need with that first pick is DE.
The Lamb pick was a mistake and I had 0 doubt about that then or now. However, my greatest doubt about this team remains the same, they're just not good at talent evaluation and compound that by doubling down on some of their selections because they look at it from an ego standpoint. If it is mine, it must be good.
Lamb? No thank you, give me the beef!
No argument there and Chaisson might turn out to be a bust but that's not my point. Team building is about coming back time and time again until you do get it right.Too early to judge Chaison but one thing that’s a proven fact
Lamb had more impact this year than he did
Anytime you have the chance to draft a talent... and I said talent, not player, there is a difference,, you do it without hesitation.Terrible opinion. And apparently a fluid one. First we never should have taken a WR at all, then we should have taken a different WR.
If anything, this year shows the team needs every top talent it can get, almost regardless of position.
They ended up 6-10 because of injuries.They chose to put the D behind that and ended up 6-10.
They were already the #2 pass offense in the league in 2019.
Wait, so taking three Tacos in a row would be the right move?No argument there and Chaisson might turn out to be a bust but that's not my point. Team building is about coming back time and time again until you do get it right.
Matt Millen was a doofus on WR's but he did get it right but it took him 3 times.
I wouldn't call then good but they have improved and you'll get the statmeisters trying to make a case that the Cowboys are a great drafting team but they are not. The only stat we need is the W-L.
The problem with some is that they judge these players against others on this team and the fact they can start for the Cowboys means little. To top this off, they make the wrong calls on which players to extend and let walk too much. Hitchens is a better LB than anyone they have and Byron Jones was their best DB, by far.
All comes back to the same issue whether it's FA or the draft, evaluation of talent and value estimation.
LOL at thinking CD wouldn't have been comparable if Dak didn't get hurt.LOL
Justin Jefferson just broke Randy Moss’ rookie receiving record for a season.
Lamb wasn’t even the best WR at that point in the draft and DAL shouldn’t have even been drafting a WR. LOL.
everyone seems to gloss over that fact when trying to make themselves appear right..They ended up 6-10 because of injuries.
Picking a WR was a mistake, didn't matter if it was Jeudy, Ruggs or Jefferson or Lamb. It's not about Lamb, he's a good player. Great player? We shall see about that but he better learn to run better routes and not count on getting the 2nd or 3rd CB covering him. All the Lamb lovers, that are not Sooner fans, haven't seen him as the #1WR drawing the best CB without Cooper and Gallup on the field. He was also the beneficiary of an offense extremely generous to the WR position, just as it was Hollywood Brown the year before Lamb. Riley isn't all about the QB like many think, he's a run first guy and that frees up his WR's.Lamb was a mistake?
Hopefully your a better moderator than an evaluator.
You add Pitts to this offense and you'll have the #1 offense in the league even better than Kansas city.Defense? Pfft ... Wait until we draft Kyle Pitts
Legit top 10 talent drops to you at 17 you take it. Winning is about having better players. Not passing on better players.Yes, it was a mistake because it was all for flash and splash while bobbing around on the ocean, it was a pick for applause.
You add Pitts to this offense and you'll have the #1 offense in the league even better than Kansas city.
So then you agree with taking Greg Ellis over Randy Moss?Yes, it was a mistake because it was all for flash and splash while bobbing around on the ocean, it was a pick for applause. It was all luxury for a team deep in needs.
The case some make is the value of Lamb at 17. Was he not a value at 16, 15, 14, 13? Why did those GM's pass on him? Because they're GM's with their jobs on the line to improve the team, not take a bow for a draft pick.
Another case is what D player was worth that pick? Chaisson? The answer is any D player that could help the worst D in the league and worst in Cowboys history. He didn't have to be a world beater, just a player they could count on to be 1 of the 11.
1 of 11. How many do they have now? If they'd used that on a D player, might they be closer than they are now? And what if he doesn't work out? Then they'd know and keep going back to the well.
I saw all of the celebrating here when they took Lamb and few asking why was he available? Partly because most GM's were trying to fill needs and partly because they didn't have him at 6th on their board.
He was the Cowboys first pick and led them in drops and was 2nd in the league in drops but his fans here will make excuses for him. And WR is the most plentiful position in the league.
This draft should be the easiest for the Cowboys, if they go D as they should have last year. Their needs are plenty and the only position they don't need with that first pick is DE.
The Lamb pick was a mistake and I had 0 doubt about that then or now. However, my greatest doubt about this team remains the same, they're just not good at talent evaluation and compound that by doubling down on some of their selections because they look at it from an ego standpoint. If it is mine, it must be good.
Lamb? No thank you, give me the beef!
Yes, it was a mistake because it was all for flash and splash while bobbing around on the ocean, it was a pick for applause. It was all luxury for a team deep in needs.
The case some make is the value of Lamb at 17. Was he not a value at 16, 15, 14, 13? Why did those GM's pass on him? Because they're GM's with their jobs on the line to improve the team, not take a bow for a draft pick.
Another case is what D player was worth that pick? Chaisson? The answer is any D player that could help the worst D in the league and worst in Cowboys history. He didn't have to be a world beater, just a player they could count on to be 1 of the 11.
1 of 11. How many do they have now? If they'd used that on a D player, might they be closer than they are now? And what if he doesn't work out? Then they'd know and keep going back to the well.
I saw all of the celebrating here when they took Lamb and few asking why was he available? Partly because most GM's were trying to fill needs and partly because they didn't have him at 6th on their board.
He was the Cowboys first pick and led them in drops and was 2nd in the league in drops but his fans here will make excuses for him. And WR is the most plentiful position in the league.
This draft should be the easiest for the Cowboys, if they go D as they should have last year. Their needs are plenty and the only position they don't need with that first pick is DE.
The Lamb pick was a mistake and I had 0 doubt about that then or now. However, my greatest doubt about this team remains the same, they're just not good at talent evaluation and compound that by doubling down on some of their selections because they look at it from an ego standpoint. If it is mine, it must be good.
Lamb? No thank you, give me the beef!