Things we wish were true but aren’t

You think you're saying something profound here, but what it amounts to is you think he's great in spite of fair criticism.
Anyone in his position is going to take criticism . And I’m not saying he’s not acceptable to it.

But there are fans who act like he’s making these all on his own accord not looking at whose interest he’s representing.
 
We know it doesn't matter, and we know why. If these bozos could build a champion they would've done it by now.

082b3a8a62d1b87e4a481f3ea74d6ba3-original.jpg
This is what Hubris looks like. These guys are as naked the fabled “Emperor’s New Clothes” story. And twice as arrogant.
 
No. You're saying he can't be held responsible for his decisions because of who he represents.
He’s held accountable or responsible to the owners and the league. His actions are a reflection of the owners and leagues stance.

Now whether you agree with how he carries out those marching orders is up to you but in the end or bottomline I’d argue the owners and everyone with their hand in the NFL pockets would applaud. And why they are so handsomely rewarding him.
 
He’s held accountable or responsible to the owners and the league. His actions are a reflection of the owners and leagues stance.

Now whether you agree with how he carries out those marching orders is up to you but in the end or bottomline I’d argue the owners and everyone with their hand in the NFL pockets would applaud. And why they are so handsomely rewarding him.

So you think the owners are cool with Tyreek Hill not being suspended for breaking his kid's arm. Gotcha.
 
No. You're saying he can't be held responsible for his decisions because of who he represents.
Responsible is a broad description. If you mean he’s accountable for how he carries out his marching orders and their effects, yes. And the owners and league will hold him accountable.

But if you mean he’s acting or responsible for the policies he’s administered then I’d say no. He’s just following the guidance from those he represents.

And the fact some are blaming him instead of those he’s representing is exactly what he’s hired to do.
 
I already said what I thought. I'm trying to make sense of your position as regards his actions.
I’m not really interested in individual decisions. You win some you lose some. If you make enough decisions they all won’t be good.

The bigger picture interest me. And the league has prospered under his watch despite arguably the greatest issues to ever confront the league.
 
Too often a KB is responsible for coverage of TE and just can’t stay with them . And CB and S are usually undersized. And why a big TE with great hands is such a threat especially in middle of the field.
I get all that, but you're still missing my point. There are more than a of few times every game when these guys have no one, not a safety, not a CB, no one, covering them. And it's usually on 3rd and long or at the goal line. Either scheme or blown coverages.
 
You think you're saying something profound here, but what it amounts to is you think he's great in spite of fair criticism.
Many successful people receive criticism for some of their actions and decisions. Ultimately the results and end game are the measurement.
 
I get all that, but you're still missing my point. There are more than a of few times every game when these guys have no one, not a safety, not a CB, no one, covering them. And it's usually on 3rd and long or at the goal line. Either scheme or blown coverages.
And why do you think that is?
 
Because he is doing his job. I don't get why you blame him for stuff that is clearly on the owners.

I'll go out on a limb and guess it's because he sucks at his job.

What other GM keeps his job with 3 playoff wins in 25 years?
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
475,617
Messages
14,627,192
Members
24,220
Latest member
Wineorange
Back
Top