This Is the reason you don't pay RBs Big Money

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
No, losing your mind over the very IDEA we might shop him around or let him shop, rather than sign him to a big contract.

Stop moving the goal posts.

Shop him? Are you talking about possibly trading him right now? He will be a free agent at the end of the year, so they can't trade him then. It would be dumb to trade him now. Maybe he isn't the best back in the league, but he and the offensive line are in sync. You don't make major moves to disrupt that type of chemistry. They wouldn't get anything of value in return anyway. No team would trade anything for an impending free agent. I wouldn't be shocked if Dallas loses him to free agency, but trading him isn't an option at this point.
 

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,941
Reaction score
8,681
It is not just this year he had over 1,000 in only 14 games last season and 10 TD to boot. He was a top 10 back despite the fact he had way fewer carries than any of the top backs in the league.

I wasn't referring to Murray when I said small sample. It was in reference to the OP which seemed to be insinuating that guys like McCoy, Charles, and Forte have bad contacts because they aren't top 10 in rushing yards through the 1st 4 weeks of this season.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,230
Reaction score
20,501
Keeping and paying Murray provides options and some degree of leverage to keep the receivers salaries reasonable. I'm not saying low ball Dez or any of the other guys, but having a great player at one position like RB makes them key on the run a lot more and gives the wide receivers more favorable situations.
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,503
Reaction score
12,523
No way in hell I pay Murray 5 million per year, not even if he leads the league in rushing. Why compete with yourself? Do you think another team will be so infatuated with Murray that they will give him 5,000,000 per year? No way.
 

Fletch

To The Moon
Messages
18,395
Reaction score
14,042
I don't "act" that way, I believe it.

He is not in any way special, he is not nifty. YOU are losing your mind over the very IDEA we might shop him around or let him test the market. Why is that?

If it's so easy to replace Murray, then we shouldn't have any problem replacing him if he leaves. But riddle me this Batman, when was the last time we had this kind of production from a RB? Emmitt? Maybe Barber? Those are pretty significant gaps between nifty Emmitt, and a pretty good back in Marion, that was short-lived at best.
Now I know our O line is finally coming together, and that Murray is benefiting from this upstart O line, but don't start discounting Murray's ability. Demarco is a very balanced RB (runs and blocks well). He's not Emmitt, and I'm not sure we'll ever see another Emmitt in our lifetime, but Murray is the best RB we've had since 22.
Let's not be so quick to think we can simply replace Murray with anyone, regardless of the rise in O line production.
 

HappyOnions

Datwin
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2,106
Murray has talent, lots of it.

Our line is amazing, but saying Murray is just benefiting from it and that any marginally talented back could have the same success is ridiculous. It's like when people say Emmitt was only a product of his line...

Infuriating.
 

Fletch

To The Moon
Messages
18,395
Reaction score
14,042
Murray has talent, lots of it.

Our line is amazing, but saying Murray is just benefiting from it and that any marginally talented back could have the same success is ridiculous. It's like when people say Emmitt was only a product of his line...

Infuriating.

Any good O line and a good RB are like dance partners. They know the other's tendencies; strengths and weaknesses. This O Line and Murray are dancing the Tango pretty well right now. Why not keep this tandem together for awhile longer? Just doesn't make since to think that the Cowboys will be able to throw anybody behind Tony and the O line and think that the production we're seeing now will continue without a hitch.
 

HappyOnions

Datwin
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2,106
To everyone saying Murray is just someone we can replace on a whim. Do you really want the garbage train of backs that we had after Emmitt?

Stop, just stop with all this Murray disrespect.

He's leading the league in rushing by well over 100+ yards, he's averaged 5 or more yards per carry in 3 of his 4 seasons, he has the most yards in a single game by any Dallas Cowboys running back, he's one of 4 players in NFL history to start the season with 4 games of 100+ yards and a TD, the Cowboys are like 14-1 when he has 20 or more carries, and more than any of that, it's all right in front of your faces. Look how this team plays when they have a great rushing attack. Murray is working great right now, why some people want to insert "rookie or practice squad RB" instead of him is absolutely insane.
 

Fletch

To The Moon
Messages
18,395
Reaction score
14,042
To everyone saying Murray is just someone we can replace on a whim. Do you really want the garbage train of backs that we had after Emmitt?

Stop, just stop with all this Murray disrespect.

He's leading the league in rushing by well over 100+ yards, he's averaged 5 or more yards per carry in 3 of his 4 seasons, he has the most yards in a single game by any Dallas Cowboys running back, he's one of 4 players in NFL history to start the season with 4 games of 100+ yards and a TD, the Cowboys are like 14-1 when he has 20 or more carries, and more than any of that, it's all right in front of your faces. Look how this team plays when they have a great rushing attack. Murray is working great right now, why some people want to insert "rookie or practice squad RB" instead of him in absolutely insane.

A post with facts!
 

HappyOnions

Datwin
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2,106
What does he have to with the present? You comparing Murray to Smith? ROFL

How people are speaking about them, yes it's absolutely the same. You're indicating that Murrary is a scrub and is only productive due to his line; the same things Emmitt detractors say.

"Put Barry behind that line and he'd have over 20,000 yards easily"

"Put any marginally talented slug behind that line, and they'd get over a 1000 yards as well. Emmitt was nothing special"

"Put Ryan Williams behind that line and he'd have the same kind of success as Murray"

Insane...
 

TrailBlazer

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,841
Reaction score
3,525
Randle or williams could put up a 1000 yard season in this zone blocking scheme with this oline. Easily.
 

HappyOnions

Datwin
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2,106
Really? Go ahead and find where I called Murray a scrub.

Refresh my memory.

Scrub was just hyperbole, I realize you didn't actually call him that. But you did indicate that his production really isn't about him at all.

"I'll take Randle and our current OL. You guys can have Murray.

Again, I like Murray, but the success is Mostly cuz of the OL."

"Its mostly the line, by far."

Murray leads the league BY FAR in yards before contact. Its the OL... by far.

The comparison between Emmitt and Murray come from these kinds of statements about each player; that's why people were comparing the two.
 

Szczepanik

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,003
Reaction score
1,712
What does he have to with the present? You comparing Murray to Smith? ROFL

Your knock on Murray is that our OL is so strong that we can merely replace Murray with someone else.

You know what I am getting at. Smith also had the benefit of having one of the best ever OL's in football history.

So spare me the laughs and don't act like it was an outlandish comparison.

What is your opinion of Smith? By your logic based on Murray, alot of other RB's would have easily had the success behind our line that Smith had.
 

HappyOnions

Datwin
Messages
2,570
Reaction score
2,106
Randle or williams could put up a 1000 yard season in this zone blocking scheme with this oline. Easily.

Yes, Ryan Williams and his 58 career carries, 164 yards, 0 TDs, and 2.8 YPC is going to instantly turn into a superstar.
 
Top