InmanRoshi
Zone Scribe
- Messages
- 18,334
- Reaction score
- 90
davidyee said:...fabricating things here. At no time during the Patriots first run did BB say he was ditching the season to see how this Brady kid turns out.
Bledsoe had a "life threatening" injury. Brady had to play. It had nothing to do with "Long Term" it was he needed to put in his best QB.
I'm certain the coaches had a feeling for what they had with Brady or else they would have searched the waiver wire. They wer still in the playoff hunt and you don't throw games in this league.
In the time I have watched the Patriots I have never had the feeling that BB never has NOT played to WIN!!!
By the time Drew was ready to see the field this kid had caught lightning in a bottle and Belechick would have been a fool to upset the apple cart. All he would have to do is wait for the kid to fall flat on his face then reinstate the veteran. Has history shows outside of one game Bledsoe lost his opportunity to Brady.
Notice how Bledsoe doesn't harbour any ill will towards Brady? I thkn Drew knew that this teams was Tom's after the SuperBowl win and he waswn't going to change that no matter what.
Your proposal is preposterous!
Perfectly said. People are wanting to compare situations like they are even remotely alike.
If you think Bill Belichick would have played Drew Henson this year instead of Bledsoe and fought through a 1-15 season in the name of finding the "franchise" Qb, you haven't followed Bill Belichick's career very much. He didn't do it with Cleveland and he didn't do it with New England. In Cleveland he brought in Testeverde rather than draft and develop a young QB.
In New England he showed that repeatedly he would rather win now with older stop-gap veterans than strip everything down to 1-15 and build around a nucleus of Top 10 draft picks. He had one 5-11 team his first year, and he decided that was enough of that. Here come Roman Phifer, Terrell Buckley and Anthony Pleasant and any other cheap/stop gap measure he could get his hands on.