I tried pointing that out last week but I was just being a negative Dak hater.Guess It helps padding the stats when you play the Eagles 4th,5th,6th string Corner with a 3rd string safety.
This is just Dak. This is what he is. Now deep into his 3rd year, it is likely what he will be, with some variation +/-.
Dak is not a QB who is going to throw for 400+ every week. That was a statistical anomaly. A total outlier when you look at the body of his work.
So no, this was not a bad game from Dak. It was just a regression to his mean coming off a big week last week.
I actually agree with you. It wasnt a bad game for DAK... and was close to his avg game... maybe slighty below, but for HIM, it was close to normal.This is just Dak. This is what he is. Now deep into his 3rd year, it is likely what he will be, with some variation +/-.
Dak is not a QB who is going to throw for 400+ every week. That was a statistical anomaly. A total outlier when you look at the body of his work.
So no, this was not a bad game from Dak. It was just a regression to his mean coming off a big week last week.
Clutch only matters if the score is within reach at the end of the game. If you're out of it by the start of the 4th clutch is useless.We really can’t criticize Dak in this loss. Just think how bad it woulda been if he wasn’t clutch.
I guess you can argue that...but its back to what I argued before..... Zeke, less than a 100 we are now 1-5. this offense runs through zeke.I actually agree with you. It wasnt a bad game for DAK... and was close to his avg game... maybe slighty below, but for HIM, it was close to normal.
Now compared to the better QBs... this was a very bad game.
I am going to judge Dak based upon one thing from here on, and that is how many points we score. Thats it.
This is just Dak. This is what he is. Now deep into his 3rd year, it is likely what he will be, with some variation +/-.
Dak is not a QB who is going to throw for 400+ every week. That was a statistical anomaly. A total outlier when you look at the body of his work.
So no, this was not a bad game from Dak. It was just a regression to his mean coming off a big week last week.
You should go do that.Why dont you start a thread about our non existent pass rush and run d too. How were they today?
Agreed.
Folks keep trying to bring up the fact he’s in his third year.
Precisely.
He’s in his third year and he’s got fundamental issues with the primary function of being a QB. Throwing the ball.
Clutch is scoring enough points for your team to win, no matter when you score ‘em.Clutch only matters if the score is within reach at the end of the game. If you're out of it by the start of the 4th clutch is useless.
I tried pointing that out last week but I was just being a negative Dak hater.
Guess It helps padding the stats when you play the Eagles 4th,5th,6th string Corner with a 3rd string safety.
You should go do that.
Or w Dak padding w a bad TSmith at lt, and no Frederick all year, or ZMartin late in that game. But Philly gets a pass for their injuries.
Big difference in bad play from an oline man ..and online injury than a whole secondary being gone plus the back ups to the back ups out too.Or w Dak padding w a bad TSmith at lt, and no Frederick all year, or ZMartin late in that game. But Philly gets a pass for their injuries.
Romo isn’t here. We’re talking about Dal now because he is the QB. If Romo comes back we can talk about how he’s playing.And Romo was throwing a ton of ints his 1st 3 years too.
I think it's more funny when people use that to invalidate a decent game when the efforts results in a win.I tried pointing that out last week but I was just being a negative Dak hater.