kevm3
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,826
- Reaction score
- 12,862
Please read the first post of this thread.
If it was all about pure stats on paper, we never would have let Weeden go because he had an awesome qb rating for a while.
Please read the first post of this thread.
"gazillion"....??? wow so now it is up that high ?? lol
it was fair market value, and less than what they paid crawford, who was the one overpaid.
Would rather have given that money to murray and replace crawford.
also had they kept murray romo would not have got hurt in philly.
The whole course of events would have been changed, so good chance romo makes it thru the year.
It took dallas half the season to find the right rb and get run game going good, that isnt good.
They should have signed murray, and signed dez back up in april, so they could keep him in shape and in all the activities etc, and maybe he
doesnt get hurt either.
One of the things the 7-game losing streak demonstrated was that your running game doesn't matter much if you can't pass.
Unfortunately, your running game only complements your passing game, it can't rescue it. The last time we faced a defense comparable to Carolina's was the Lions in the playoffs last year. We didn't win that game by running the ball, and we weren't going to win this one that way either.today didn't help your theory
There will be even less play action with Cassel, if his four starts are any indication. Small samples, but his pass rating is 20 points lower with play action, Romo's was 35 points higher.And the running game won't help the pass if you're among the last in the league in using play-action..
There will be even less play action with Cassel, if his four starts are any indication. Small samples, but his pass rating is 20 points lower with play action, Romo's was 35 points higher.
The three picks he threw in the opener against the 9ers were all off play action, then he ended up leading the league in passer rating, so that ranking was probably a good thing.I believe last year, even with Romo, we were around 27.
The three picks he threw in the opener against the 9ers were all off play action, then he ended up leading the league in passer rating, so that ranking was probably a good thing.
Posts like that are as easy (and as inevitable) as sneezing, but know that a team's rushing numbers will never tell the whole story. You have to be able to pass and stop the pass to have success.I have stated many times over stats are cute little numbers that don't tell the whole story.
Again that point is made clear by this team's play.
I don't think so either, but it's hard to complain about not enough play action passes when the guy wins a passing title.I don't think Romo is that inept off throwing the ball off play-action, like that's his kryptonite..
Posts like that are as easy (and as inevitable) as sneezing, but know that a team's rushing numbers will never tell the whole story. You have to be able to pass and stop the pass to have success.
I don't think so either, but it's hard to complain about not enough play action passes when the guy wins a passing title.
Maybe you're right, and with more PA, he'd have won it going away.
today didn't help your theory