xwalker
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 57,202
- Reaction score
- 64,708
He is 6-3.He doesn't fit this scheme his body is too tall for us inside.
He is 6-3.He doesn't fit this scheme his body is too tall for us inside.
The Cowboys gave up fairly early on Thornton. From what I read he was having a decent camp and I was hopeful he would be a solid rotational guy. Had they replaced him with another quality player I would feel better, but don't feel we upgraded.
He's too lean. He looks lanky. Wasn't a scheme fit , he's a 5 technique.He is 6-3.
The 298 listing is wrong. He said he peaked at 280.
Ask @FuzzyLumpkins if Lewis Neal is a 1tech.
I think some snaps at 5 (SDE) would be OK but he wouldn't be a mainstay there, IMO.
Good for you! Let it all out!9m for 1 year of Thornton is a horrible deal...... it is that easy to say
The Cowboys gave up fairly early on Thornton. From what I read he was having a decent camp and I was hopeful he would be a solid rotational guy. Had they replaced him with another quality player I would feel better, but don't feel we upgraded.
Still think he's a 1/3 and so do a lot of people. Agreed he'd play 5 only occasionally.
A year or two in the weight room and maybe. I've just seem him get put on skates by single blocking guards. It's very hard to beat the inside double teams with quickness and the way we line up with the SDE on the outside shoulder there is nowhere inside for him to go at the 1. He has two guys right on top of him uncovered.
You can combo him, truck him back to muck up the second level and the peeler can clean up easily. On passing downs sure but as a 2 down player he'll be too easy to blow up.
His technique was better outside as it was. I see him as yet another SDE/3T. He just doesn't have the size for the slant nose.
I thought he was injured at some point in camp.
Maybe they put him on pseudo-IR by releasing him considering he has a guaranteed salary. They could resign him at any time and he does not make any additional money by signing with another team unless they pay him more than 3M.
Don't agree for how they play here. He's been very disruptive and the reason is we shoot the gaps most of the time. We're not holding or even shoot and hold. He's a penetrator. If he's asked to hold then he's going to have trouble, as do most 1/3 techs, with double teams. Not many DTs can hold up against a G and C without being moved.
This is a good point. From what I can remember, he seemed to be playing fine in camp as a rotational player until he got hurt. I'm not sure he ever recovered from his hamstring injury and simply was not an integral enough part of this defense for Dallas to hold on to until he was back to full health.
I'm disappointed that he was not better than he was during his time here, but the move may have more to do with needing completely healthy bodies for an interior rotation in these first few games, especially without Irving.
Sure but that is what you are looking for in the 1T for this defense. They are supposed to occupy two blockers so the MIKE can run free. With Neal the OG just has to stay long enough to take away the quick inside move and he can peel. Once OL get their hands on Neal it is over.
At the 3 he can win with quickness because the RDE should occupy the OT and leave him 1v1 in the B gap. In the A gap though he has nowhere to go because the SDE has to cut across the face of the OT to occupy the OG.
And plenty of DT can take a knee and sit down on a double team. Sure most may give up a yard or two in doing so but all I have seen Neal do is get dug out and driven hard.
If Paea goes down I see them calling up Ash before Neal. He sits down on double teams well.
Again we disagree. The DTs shoot most plays in this D. And Neal has been praised for his ability to make contact first and use his hands well. He's not being asked to play a 0 or a 1 that holds. His technique and disruption is why he's on the PS.