TO looking like a declining player....

[Hoofbite]

I love it when people watch about 10 weeks of subpar play and then puff their chests up after a player has a good game or two.

 

[dbair1967]

TO is flat out ballin tonight!!!!

 

[Joe Realist]

TO is flat out ballin tonight!!!!

Especially that 3rd down drop

 

[Joe Realist]

Nice effort on deep ball, Owens

 

[SaltwaterServr]

Nice effort on deep ball, Owens

Again, good effort there Terrell. No effort whatsoever to adjust on that ball. He just gave Revis the interception to seal the game.

McCordsville, your horse sucks.

6 catches for 44 yards against Revis in two games. :laugh2: :laugh1:

 

[stilltheguru]

Again, good effort there Terrell. No effort whatsoever to adjust on that ball. He just gave Revis the interception to seal the game.

McCordsville, your horse sucks.

6 catches for 44 yards against Revis in two games. :laugh2: :laugh1:

What is Randys stats in 2 games against Revis? Guess he sucks too.

 

[Rampage]

MI and TR discuss TO without ever spelling it out
9:51 PM Thu, Dec 03, 2009 | Permalink
Barry Horn/Reporter E-mail News tips

So I'm minding my own business watching the Jets-Bills on NFL Network -- not because I want to but because my contracts says I have to -- and the halftime conversation turns to the Cowboys.

There's Michael Irvin interviewing Tony Romo and asking him what's the difference this season in his relationship with his receivers. Romo never mentioned Terrell Owens but said, "This team, If there is a difference, this team looks at themselves individually and asks, 'How can I get better? How can I improve?'...Whereas It may not have been that way across the board last year."

Then Romo added: "People support each other. When times get tough they don't turn and point fingers. Everyone asks themselves how can we do better to help the team, help turn it around. That approach has got to be the right way."

Yes, Romo was talking about Terrell Owens. The guys in the studio -- Rich Eisen, Deion Sanders and Marshall Faulk even mentioned his name.

 

[SaltwaterServr]

MI and TR discuss TO without ever spelling it out
9:51 PM Thu, Dec 03, 2009 | Permalink
Barry Horn/Reporter E-mail News tips

So I'm minding my own business watching the Jets-Bills on NFL Network -- not because I want to but because my contracts says I have to -- and the halftime conversation turns to the Cowboys.

There's Michael Irvin interviewing Tony Romo and asking him what's the difference this season in his relationship with his receivers. Romo never mentioned Terrell Owens but said, "This team, If there is a difference, this team looks at themselves individually and asks, 'How can I get better? How can I improve?'...Whereas It may not have been that way across the board last year."

Then Romo added: "People support each other. When times get tough they don't turn and point fingers. Everyone asks themselves how can we do better to help the team, help turn it around. That approach has got to be the right way."

Yes, Romo was talking about Terrell Owens. The guys in the studio -- Rich Eisen, Deion Sanders and Marshall Faulk even mentioned his name.

Ah, it's nice to have that particular fart out of our elevator.

 

[SLATEmosphere]

TO sucks and if it wasn't for his body of work he would be another JAG reciever these past 2 years.

Chris Chambers>>TO

 

[Hostile]

What is Randys stats in 2 games against Revis? Guess he sucks too.

I didn't see him pimping Randy Moss.

9 receptions, 58 yards, 1 TD.

 

[ScipioCowboy]

After last night's game, the thread title could not be more accurate.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

Again, good effort there Terrell. No effort whatsoever to adjust on that ball. He just gave Revis the interception to seal the game.

McCordsville, your horse sucks.

6 catches for 44 yards against Revis in two games. :laugh2: :laugh1:

Revis would make anyone look like a bum.

He is a stud. Good Job Revis!

 

[dbair1967]

Revis would make anyone look like a bum.

He is a stud. Good Job Revis!

Revis is an outstanding CB, problem is TO looks just like he did last night against virtually everybody now. Every team on TO's schedule the last 32 games or so doesnt have a Revis covering him.

TO=insignificant NFL player now

 

[Givincer]

To suggest who a receiver's quarterback is doesn't matter is quite profound.

Look what Randy Moss did in Oakland. Everyone said the exact same thing. Everyone except those who knew Randy Moss was playing for an awful team.

 

[thechosen1n2]

If we actually examine TO's production over the past two seasons -- rather than anecdotally extracting only the last two games -- we see that TO is clearly in decline.

Regardless of his attitude, his production simply didn't warrant his contract.

Oh, and before you wisenheimers play the Roy Williams card, let me ask you this: Would you want two overpaid receivers on the roster? At least Roy is still in his 20s.

the thing is you are paying them both anyway...Yes he is on the decline, but better than what we have. Would I resign him...NO, but I would not have eaten 9 mil either.

 

[thechosen1n2]

Its amazing to see both sides of this argument Cop Pleas and make excuses for their side.

Lovers say- Revis is a stud, he stops everybody. Revis had nothing to do with the TO drop on a critical 3rd down, because TO had beat him. Thats TOs fault and TOs fault alone.

Haters act as if that last Int was TOs fault when he had beat Revis and the ball was underthrown. Its hard to put on breaks and comeback and fight for a ball. He had gone up and faught for a ball earlier that could have been a pick.

Then everyone is so quick to point out that Romo was speaking of TO when he was talking about finger pointing, but failed to realize he could have been talking about his personal growth as well, because I recall Romo finger pointing at Garrett to the public as well. Not to mention, It was TO defending Romo from the Finger Pointing against some of you fans.

 

[joseephuss]

To suggest who a receiver's quarterback is doesn't matter is quite profound.

Look what Randy Moss did in Oakland. Everyone said the exact same thing. Everyone except those who knew Randy Moss was playing for an awful team.

According to some on here who think TO should not have been released also think that Romo sucks. By that rationale, keeping TO would not have mattered because Romo would not be able to get him the ball.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

Its amazing to see both sides of this argument Cop Pleas and make excuses for their side.

Lovers say- Revis is a stud, he stops everybody. Revis had nothing to do with the TO drop on a critical 3rd down, because TO had beat him. Thats TOs fault and TOs fault alone.

Haters act as if that last Int was TOs fault when he had beat Revis and the ball was underthrown. Its hard to put on breaks and comeback and fight for a ball. He had gone up and faught for a ball earlier that could have been a pick.

Then everyone is so quick to point out that Romo was speaking of TO when he was talking about finger pointing, but failed to realize he could have been talking about his personal growth as well, because I recall Romo finger pointing at Garrett to the public as well. Not to mention, It was TO defending Romo from the Finger Pointing against some of you fans.

Excellent Post.

 

[dbair1967]

To suggest who a receiver's quarterback is doesn't matter is quite profound.

Look what Randy Moss did in Oakland. Everyone said the exact same thing. Everyone except those who knew Randy Moss was playing for an awful team.

Most of Moss' problems in Oakland were from total lack of effort, and its why they got basically nothing in return via trade. Nobody wanted him because he was a dog, and everbody could see it.

 

[joseephuss]

Most of Moss' problems in Oakland were from total lack of effort, and its why they got basically nothing in return via trade. Nobody wanted him because he was a dog, and everbody could see it.

You could see some of that Monday night against the Saints.