Tony Romo among QB's nominated for the HOF

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,988
Reaction score
63,120
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
As I know how intelligent you are I'm not gonna sling some immature personal insult.
I'll throw out several names to which I think were just as talented as runners as Martin and you are totally entitled to your own opinion.
But to me and like I said just my personal opinion, Martin was no better than:
Shaun Alexander, Stephen Jackson, Tiki Barber, Cory Dillon, Jamal Lewis, Ricky Watters or even Ricky Williams.
Heck, Clinton Portis even gets an honorable mention to Martin.

If your opinion is based on Martin's longevity stats or whatever I can respect that. I do not see him as one of the best to ever run with a football.

But like you said my opinion means squat.
Respectfully

jmo
I was curious if other members felt the same. It was not Martin's longevity in my eyes. I consider him a superior running back to all those you mentioned. Honestly, I respected Barber's brother more as a pro in particular, even though they did not play the same position.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
61,988
Reaction score
63,120
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
More likely it was because of his relationship with his brother. They enjoy talking about stuff together. I doubt there was much calculation in it on the part of Eli. Peyton was likely calculating a good career move, and invited his brother to join him.
I said one reason. There is not any reason to discount all possible ulterior motives outside those you have suggested.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,520
Reaction score
76,362
If he had the hardware, his record would be better than 2-4…..that’s my point

Eli Mannings is 8-4 with the 2 SBs…….ergo, “ The Hardware”
I get what you’re saying I’m saying had he simply made a SB or even gone to a NFC championship he would have a chance. I think it says something simply making a bunch of playoffs even if you don’t win the ring.
 

tomokawan

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,023
Reaction score
757
I don't even think its the hardware that's the issue. Romo's playoff record was 2-4. To only have 6 playoff games in a 10+ year career is abysmal. I think you could make the argument if he had more playoff appearances. And he would've had he not got hurt in 2015 and 2016......not sure if they would've ever won a ring but surely would've won some of those games.
He threw too many untimely interceptions IMO. No way he is any where close to being a hall of famer. He was a good QB, but that is it. It crazy talk to even think he belongs in the hall.
 

Calvin2Tony2Emmitt2Julius

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,651
Reaction score
1,923
Romo is NOT HOF material. He couldn't get the team to a NFC Conference game.
So What???? It's the H.O.F not the front runners Cup Dan Fouts, Dan Marino, Fran Tarkenton, John Jefferson, Harold Carmichael, Dick Butkus and Many others never won a ring . They are H.O F worthy

Rings are a measure that fans use because they don't know about the Game, they only know about what's hot
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,893
Reaction score
8,063
I mean he had the regular season stats. Post season just lacking.
Archie Manning is in the HOF.

The HOF is not just about rings or team playoff accomplishments. It’s about individual stats and the person, especially his importance to the team and organization.
 
Last edited:

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
83,520
Reaction score
76,362
Archie Manning is in the HOF.

The HOF is not just about rings or team playoff accomplishments. It’s about individual stats and the person, especially his importance to the team and organization.
Archie Manning is a different era. Romo doesn’t have that same luxury.
 

MichaelValentino

Well-Known Member
Messages
283
Reaction score
436
With all due serious respect to Bo 'Knows' Jackson, he was not Gale Sayers in that era of the National Football League. Sayers was more than Jackson. He was Barry Sanders before Barry Sanders.

Some older members may wish to weigh in also. Allow his PFHOF biography (link) speak partially for him:

Gale Sayers burst upon the pro football scene in 1965 with the kind of impact that the sport had not felt in many years. It is difficult to imagine a more dynamic debut than the one he enjoyed as a rookie. In his first heavy pre-season action, he raced 77 yards on a punt return, 93 yards on a kickoff return, and then startled everyone with a 25-yard scoring pass against the Los Angeles Rams.​
In regular season, he scored four touchdowns, including a 96-yard game breaking kickoff return, against the Minnesota Vikings. And, in the next-to-last game, playing on a muddy field that would have stalled most runners, Gale scored a record-tying six touchdowns against the San Francisco 49ers. Included in his sensational spree were an 80-yard pass-run play, a 50-yard rush and a 65-yard punt return. For the entire season, Gale scored 22 touchdowns and 132 points, both then-rookie records.​
Quiet, unassuming, and always ready to compliment a teammate for a key block, Sayers continued to sizzle in 1967 and well into the 1968 season. Then, in the ninth game, Sayers suffered a knee injury that required immediate surgery.
After a tortuous rehabilitation program, Gale came back in 1969 in a most spectacular manner, winding up with his second 1,000-yard rushing season and universal Comeback of the Year honors. But injuries continued to take their toll and, just before the 1972 season, Gale finally had to call it quits.​
In his relatively short career, he compiled a record that can never be forgotten. His totals show 9,435 combined net yards, 4,956 yards rushing, and 336 points scored. At the time of his retirement he was the NFL's all-time leader in kickoff return yards. He won All-NFL honors five straight years and was named Offensive Player of the Game in three of the four Pro Bowls in which he played.​

Forget statistics for a moment. 'Eye test' is an overused term but it perfectly suited Sayers. In an abbreviated career, Sayers awed players, coaches, fans and the Board of Selectors alike into believing he might be the best NFL player of all-time. Jackson was a two-sport freak of nature. Perhaps Jackson might would have fully inspired everyone of his NFL legend if he had dedicated himself to it full-time. People saw glimpses of Jackson's greatness whenever baseball did not interrupt them. Sayers was showcased during his entire career.

I encourage anyone. Research Sayers. Look for old video of him. The man was more than twice the legend of Jackson in his time. The Hall will be lucky to get Jackson one day. The Hall needed players like Sayers to forever validate its existence. That is no exaggeration.
Great response to blueblood70 — who, somehow, argues for Gale Sayers’ undeserving place in Canton. Wow, what some people actually post here and aren’t utterly embarrassed for doing so!

Maybe he never saw Sayers play. Or maybe he can’t recognize sheer greatness.

The Kansas Comet was an unbelievable talent, and one of the greatest runners in NFL history. He graced us with his presence but for a short time, but the mark he left was indelible.

Gale was the fastest back of his era. He ran a 9.5 100 yard dash at KU. He had great acceleration — second only to Dorsett from my point of view — and could cut on a dime.

He had two good OL in front of him and three average guys. But all he needed was a crack — 18 inches to daylight as he called it — and he was through the gap and making guys miss left and right.

No football historian or coach or announcer who’s ever seen Sayers play would question his enshrinement in Canton.

No. 40 had skills matched by a handful of backs in the history of the NFL. I’m glad you know football and posted what you did. I could write a thousand more words but will leave it at that.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,209
Reaction score
32,605
I'm all for any Cowboy going into the HoF. But I don't think Romo deserves it.
I did say, however, that his television presence as a top game announcer would help his chances, just I expect for Darren Woodson.
 

NumOneQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,431
Reaction score
3,764
Wow, that entire list of nominees is not HoF worthy. I’d be shocked if any of them get in, especially Romo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G2

atlantacowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,254
Reaction score
26,689
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Archie Manning is in the HOF.

The HOF is not just about rings or team playoff accomplishments. It’s about individual stats and the person, especially his importance to the team and organization.
Archie Manning is NOT in the pro football HOF. He is in the college football HOF.

The NFL HOF very much values winning particularly among its QBs. If you don't have a ring, you better be Dan Marino or Fran Tarkenton level and have a legendary career. Romo did not. He was never a top 5 NFL QB. His stats are a product of a pass happy era and QB protection rules.
 
Top