I will say now what I said in October and November 2016 and occasionally every year since.
Super Bowl contending possibilities are fleeting. Permanently replacing your veteran franchise quarterback is one of the biggest decisions a front office can make. Permanently replacing your veteran franchise quarterback during a highly probable Super Bowl run is not logical when no rookie quarterback in the Super Bowl era has ever appeared in or won a National Football League championship.
And it has not happened since. Yes. The opportunities for a rookie quarterback have been rare. Yes. Dak Prescott was not the sole reason why Dallas lost to Green Bay. Does any of that really matter?
The odds were against Tony Romo leading the team to a Super Bowl berth or win. The odds were zero for Prescott. Should gamblers take odds or none at all?
The writing was on the wall. Romo was not going to be in a Cowboys uniform in 2017. Jones fell in love with his successor two months into a rookie quarterback's career. Delaying the decision... to make the change... for a FEW months... would have been worth the risk.
This is not hindsight. It was said before Romo's infamous concession speech in November 2016.
Getting what you want, without considering all of the ramifications, does not always get you what you truly want. That lesson was lost on Jerry Jones also, trapped within the chemistry euphoria of the moment.