So your response to failed personnel decisions in the past is to just stop trying. Rebuild Romo until he's eligible for medicare.
No. I think this is exactly why you push for a QB early in the draft if the scouting grade is there. It's less of a projection. Take another in the draft too. Throw numbers at the position. Get it right so we don't have to play in the have nots conference in the NFL post-Romo.
The fact that you have no confidence in this front office's ability to find a QB should make you want them to get on it ASAP. It may take several attempts. Not wait until they have nothing and you're in crisis mode.
Not to over-react but..
like the Packers have done..
why not draft a couple of QBs over the next couple of seasons until somebody emerges as Romo's replacement?
Or at worst we find a starter AND a backup both of whom can play?
This front loading the QB position with 4th string clipboard holders as backups clearly has not worked in the Romo Era.
If QB is the single defining position on any successful team..
Landry solved the issue by having Morton and Meredith then Morton and Staubach. Then Danny White.
Why do you think we used to be in the playoffs for 20 straight years?
We had quality QBs playing and in the pipeline always.
And it isn't because of the salary cap.
Its becuz coaching staffs are not QB centric anymore.
Its easier to take one guy and load everything on his shoulders and then when he fails..coaches and players get fired and move on.
I think you take 2 guys and truely put them hehind center and play them both as needed.
We see it in college.
Its just football. But if applied correctly..it could revolutionize the pros.
Have 2 different type QBs..pocket passer and running QB.
Move them in and out of the lineup and force the defense to adjust and get mismatches.
Its done with RBs and WRs.
Why not QBs.?