TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 84,207
- Reaction score
- 76,828
Now I do. A hour ago? I would've said no.Do you think Beasley will get a 3rd contract
Now I do. A hour ago? I would've said no.Do you think Beasley will get a 3rd contract
nooooo Switzer can be a huge asset, ***. someone talk me down please. Im pissed
Austin will play RBI don't see Austin as an upgrade for Switzer. Not sure why they made the trade except that Austin is faster.
who very well could have had more return td's in the next few years than the Boys have had in the last 20Superfluous diminutive receiver
it is a place where middle eastern soldiers recuperate from battlefield injurieswhat is a Jihad Ward?
May nowNow I do. A hour ago? I would've said no.
According to the analyst on the NFL Network, Jihad does not fit into the up the field defensive attack the Raiders wont to utilize.I'm talking about why did the raiders give up on Jihad? he was a 2nd round pick just 2 years ago
and I guess him kneeling at the 20People complaining about Switzer's fumble, Tavon Austin has 22 of them on his career stats
Her's my 2 cents. They should have kept Switzer and traded Beasley. Beasley had his on good year and tams caught on to him. They figured out how to stop him and they basically shut him down last year. Switzer seems a little better once he has the football where Beasley was slight and easy to tackle. Switzer appears to have a little more top end speed although I didn't see him as a burner. Switzer is only in his second year contract wise where Beasley is coming up on his option year. I always thought they would let Beasley go in free agency and Switzer would move into his spot.
Its done now so what we think doesn;t really matter. But it will not surprise me if Switzer has a good year with the Raiders. I think "Chuckie" made it clear he liked Switzer a lot when he called the Cowboys games.
A couple of days ago I stated Beasley had to get traded or go because he doesn't play special teams and offensively....Switzer can offer the same thing she can.May now
But seemed to me Switzer replacing him in a rookie contract was a better plan
But I guess the rest of our receivers in rookie deal after next year serves that same poupose
Nothing burger. I never saw it with Switzer. I'm not sure why he has so many fanboys.
No one can dispute Austin's fumbling issues,but as punt returner Switzer is not in his league . Now we could say Switzer was never really given a chance, but when he was given a chance, he never came close to exhibiting the skills Austin has.I don't see Austin as an upgrade for Switzer. Not sure why they made the trade except that Austin is faster.
We are still going to have to cut at least one WR so at least we used one to fill a need. It's a good trade for us IMO. Beasley stays in the slot and Austin returns punts. What is Switzer doing for us?
Williams for EarlNow Trade Terrance Williams for a safety.
1.5 this year
1.7 next
It's quite possible the coaching staff barely used him because he didn't show anything worth using.We didn't even get to see Switzer's potential as this coaching staff barely even used him. Hopefully this trade works out for us.