Redball Express
All Aboard!!!
- Messages
- 16,253
- Reaction score
- 12,758
For most teams, this is right.
If we want to go back to 2014's identity, a RB would be worth the #4 pick in this draft if they are capable of stepping in and making plays right away.
He is one of the top five players in this draft and one of the safer choices that could be made.
Just because "normally" a back is not "worth" a top five pick is just a blanket statement that has little to no application to this particular group of players.
It is kind of like how you never take a center or guard in the first round. Seemed to work out okay before.
NORMALLY means nothing with this team.
We are anything if normal.
This team has always been unconventional in its attempts to improve in its history.
Taking a RB at 4 is very possible and it all depends on what is the plan.
If they really are not going to worry about Romo and really think he can play another 3 years..
then taking a RB makes sense to help Romo on offense as well as to protect the defense..
normal doesn't matter.
Its what fits your personnel and schemes.
I can see Elliot at 4 if they think he can fit the scheme.
I would really hate to see him go to the Jints or Eagles and have to see our defense stop him for the next 4 years twice a year.
Which I think is highly likely that they would draft him.
We can always wait and see later in the first round if some defensive player drops into the later 1st rd and trade up and take him.
Its all about knowing what you need and where to find it.
I think the big issue is after seeing what happened last year..do you regard the loss of production at RB or QB to be the critical factor and how long do you see the ability to win right now to be.
I think we go RB but maybe trade out of 4 and take Elliot a little further back or go for Henry instead.
Its going to be interesting.