Not true.
As a poster mentioned in another thread, the success rate for RBs drafted on day 3 is around 10%.
That means that outside of the first 3 rounds, 90% of running backs drafted are busts and wash out of the league.
So, if a team does not draft a RB in the first 3 rounds, the team pretty much is ignoring that position unless you think a 10% success rate is an acceptable risk.
Look at it this way my friend, do you really think the Cowboys would have practically announced tonight they are bringing Zeke back if they legitamately thought there were starting caliber RBs still available in this draft? They obviously are aware of the 10% success rate and are signing Zeke to cover themselves. Sure they might draft a RB on day 3, but they are not depending on that day 3 RB. If he happens to be in the 10% that make it, great. If he is not, then they are covered with Zeke.
Man you are really hung up on Zeke
Jerry was answering about the 40th question about him over the course of a week. Jerry says a lot of things most are nonsense.
The NFL has been speaking about RB for a few years now and the standard bell cow is at this time not what they are. This, to me, changes how you approach where and how they are drafted.
We see this playing out this year with only 4 taken in first 3 rounds.
The remaining guys are more of a complementary type of back. Exactly what the current way the position is being used today.
And Dallas, after Zeke's last contract here won't be spending for that type of back anymore. If they sign Zeke it'll be sub 4 mil a year one year deal. And should not factor in at all on drafting a RB.
There should be a guy who can help in the 5th. I'd prefer we move into 4th or top 3rd of 5th, sure, but I think there is someone who can help sitting there at 174.
But you have to change your definition of "starter" and success at RB position to see things how I do.