It's not supposed to but its alot easier to fill when the DT are winning the poa. Our LB were having to scramble on every inside run and that made it that much more difficult.
What killed us is a matter of debate but each of our division foes had those inside runs integral to their game plan. I'm a bit old school when it comes to this because football is both mano-a-mano and an emotional game. Momentum is real and getting run on right up the middle is demoralizing. DC start deviating from the gameplan and cheating to try and stop it.
I put it right there with pass coverage in the middle of the field and replacing Hardy.
Hayden upgrade
Hardy replacement
SAM upgrade
SS upgrade
At least 1 starting quality corner.
quality QB
quality RB
speed at all skill positions.
That is just to get starters and key reserves and speaks nothing of depth. This 4-12 team isn't close.
I have more time so I thought I'd reply to this again; more so to the general audience than to you. I'm hoping some here will take the time to read.
I can't emphasize enough the difference in our defense and Seattle's which is what Marinelli wants to do more of. He just doesn't have the personnel and not many do. I mention this because some (not you) don't understand how the defense works apparently.
If you shoot the gap then you have abandoned the gap and any thought of defending it. We don't play a lot of one gap control whether it is hold or shoot and hold, etc. We emphasize shooting the gaps.
If you hold you don't penetrate at all. There are many techniques as well as subtle differences in alignment in the gap but basically you wait on the play to come to you. If you shoot and hold then you penetrate between the C and G (usually for the 1) and then stop there. This removes the double team but leaves you stuck in that gap. Most RBs can run thru arm tackles so it is imperative that everyone shoot and hold their gap well or lanes will be introduced. If you shoot the gap then that says it all. Your job is to penetrate past the OL and disrupt the play. You are in the offensives backfield.
People are constantly complaining about Hayden's inability to maintain a gap. Well, most of the time that isn't his job. His job is to get thru the gap and breakdown the play. And there is a very short list of players who can play a one gap and maintain gap control when asked to esp if they are double teamed.
In a ZBS you often aren't running to a pre snap prescribed hole. The OL can ride the player and let him create the hole for the RB. This is easier when the player is shooting the gap. The OL must move his man before he gets out of the gap OR hope the RB is able to run in another direction. Otherwise the defense generally wins and often for a TFL.
I am not the biggest fan of this aspect of Marinelli's defense. And TBF he isn't blind to the weaknesses of shooting the gaps. The better defense is to vary the DL schemes and techniques to keep the OL as honest as possible and guessing. He is forced to run this variant of the one gap so much to generate the disruption because we don't have enough pressure playing it more straight.
Hayden is not the best guy around. He at best a decent one tech on a DL that is not yet ripe but a work in progress. He is also not the crappy player most here have perpetuated with loud but uninformed voices. He's in my estimation marginal. He's a guy you can put in there in rotation and not get killed play to play. He is upgradeable and my educated guess is Marinelli would love to have a very disruptive 1/3 in there.
IMO, Hardy and Crawford are good or better 3s. Both can play the 5. You can even rotate them some snaps as a 1. I'd love a dominating big guy to play some 1/3. Remember there isn't a huge difference in a 1 and a 3 in our defense. Both are lining up in a single gap and shooting it. There are differences in alignment within the gap for a 1 and 3 but they aren't that different if just shooting.
Didn't you know???? I'll buck the trend ...and pass.
