If that's the case he should be released. It really doesn't matter if we get anything for him, we just need to get rid of his contract. It helps a little next year, but a LOT in the following years.No one is trading for Romo. It's a moot point.
Releasing him doesn't take the vast majority of the money off the books.If that's the case he should be released. It really doesn't matter if we get anything for him, we just need to get rid of his contract. It helps a little next year, but a LOT in the following years.
I was ahead of the game on this, I posted this several weeks ago and got called every name in the book on here. Now these professionals see what needs to be done.
I also said the same holds true for Dez. That contract needs to go. He doesn't add enough value to justify keeping him around. He is hurt half the time and ineffective half the time he is playing. Our offense slows down ZERO without him and I told everyone this when he went down three weeks ago.
Anyway, we will see how serious Jerry Jones is about building a winner or we will see if he is just happy and content with the past 20 years.
Romo's greatest value to the Dallas Cowboys is not a trade. Romo's greatest value is on this team.
I agree that would be agressive. However, I highly doubt the Cowboys want to go down that road as difficult as it is to find a top notch QB. I mean we havent seen one since Troy Aikman.Trading a 36 year old injured QB isn't aggressive. Trading a young QB after 5 games of impressive stats for a bevy of high draft picks...that would be aggressive. Fans would go nuts, but it's one of those moves that could look genius in a few years.
Trading a 36 year old injured QB isn't aggressive. Trading a young QB after 5 games of impressive stats for a bevy of high draft picks...that would be aggressive. Fans would go nuts, but it's one of those moves that could look genius in a few years.
Next year it doesn't, the following years it saves TONS!Releasing him doesn't take the vast majority of the money off the books.
I agree that would be agressive. However, I highly doubt the Cowboys want to go down that road as difficult as it is to find a top notch QB. I mean we havent seen one since Troy Aikman.
Trading a 36 year old injured QB isn't aggressive. Trading a young QB after 5 games of impressive stats for a bevy of high draft picks...that would be aggressive. Fans would go nuts, but it's one of those moves that could look genius in a few years.
I agree that would be agressive. However, I highly doubt the Cowboys want to go down that road as difficult as it is to find a top notch QB. I mean we havent seen one since Troy Aikman.
Assuming that Prescott is the real thing. Romo stays for the season. His guaranteed money is paid out. Logic says he is released. Every club in the NFL know the situation in Dallas. Elway is the only place for Tony and the Broncos will wait. No other club would offer much everything considered.
Yes. A mid rd pick is a possiblity. Jets. Interesting. I never thought of them. That could work out. It would be hard to imagine Tony in another Uniform. Are the Jets considered contenders for a SB run?Many think just trading him this offseason, if even for a mid draft pick, the net plus is getting rid of the contract, not the return, Haley.
I think the Jets would be interested.
Yes. A mid rd pick is a possiblity. Jets. Interesting. I never thought of them. That could work out. It would be hard to imagine Tony in another Uniform. Are the Jets considered contenders for a SB run?