Jarv;1522719 said:
That seems to be the crux of the issue, he gave us a break at the time...He should have dumped us instead.
It was the best deal he could have gotten at the time. Open market or not.
Repeating the above a hundred times isn't going to make it true. Greg wasn't half the player Little or Wistrom were at the time of those contracts, and was an injury risk. Both of them were putting up double digit sacks and either playing in pro-bowls or playing for world champions.
Greg was notching seven sacks and disappearing in december for one of the league's worst teams.
He signed the absolute best deal he could get, or he wouldn't have signed it. There was no discount. He got what he's worth, and he's played like it since then. It's not Jerry's fault the market and salary cap have changed, while Greg Ellis remains the same average player with the same problems. He could've had more money if he'd just notched 10 sacks once. He couldn't. Whose fault is that?
So can we please stop repeating this myth that Ellis gave us some break? He didn't. The Cowboys don't owe him jack. They've lived up to their end of the contract they signed completely, and Greg has done nothing to warrant a change in that contract, like say a Terry Glenn or Flozell Adams.