Nirvana
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,925
- Reaction score
- 12,309
The New York Jets made a statement today with the contract extension for coach Rex Ryan.
Ryan was entering the final year of his contract with the Jets and owner Woody Johnson felt it was best to give him a multiyear deal.
The Dallas Cowboys' coach, Jason Garrett, enters the final year of his contract and will return. However, there's been no word on giving him a contract extension.
This has placed Garrett into a lame duck status. Jerry Jones disagrees about lame duck statuses because his thought process is every player and coach is fighting for a job every year regardless of length of contract.
It's probably true, but when you're trying to fix a franchise that's missed the playoffs the last four seasons, long-term stability is important. The Cowboys need that from Garrett but last year, Jones took power away from his head coach when he fired the defensive coordinator and made him give up the offensive play calling duties.
Jones has given Garrett three seasons to move the franchise forward and all it's gotten him is .500.
But Jones believes in Garrett and if that's the case, give him another year on his contract.
(article continues at link)
http://espn.go.com/blog/dallas/cowb...eal?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
lame duck
n
1. a person or thing that is disabled or ineffectual
5. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) (modifier) US designating a term of office after which the officeholder will not run for re-election
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003
I take issue with the notion that Garrett is made ineffectual with the lack of a contract extension right now. If the team can't play hard for a coach, regardless of contract, then that is on the coach. And in that case, he SHOULD be replaced.
I want to see Garrett earn his extension. So far, he has not.