Incorrect sir. Making it to the American League championship is exactly the same as Cowboys making it to the NFC Championship. The Rangers don’t have to win the WS to match the pitiful 3-4 wild card wins we have the past 28 seasons.Wait a second, by the standard one is using on thread, one has to wait to see if that even applies to the Ranger. They first must win against a long missing from the World Series team in Arizona.
If me whining would make a difference and make me feel better, I would whine, like I used to when I was younger. It didn't work then and it doesn't work now, so i won't waste my time. Too many other things to worry about.
If it works for you, have at it. Everyone deals with things their own way. Salud!
No, you are talking about winning, and the top level is then ignored....you stand corrected on issue. Good team is the point.Incorrect sir. Making it to the American League championship is exactly the same as Cowboys making it to the NFC Championship. The Rangers don’t have to win the WS to match the pitiful 3-4 wild card wins we have the past 28 seasons.
In fact, The Rangers, Mavs, and Stars have all made it to the conference championship series within the past ~17 months. Yeah, it’s that bad.
The Cowboys have always been judged by deep playoff runs and 3-4 wild card wins in nearly three decades is historically bad putting us w Lions and Wash as the only remaining nfc teams so inept they can’t win a Div game. If you can’t see how the other three local teams have experienced multiple deep playoff runs as well as championships in the past 28 years then Jerry has really done a job on you. Facts are facts.Cowboys’ Micah Parsons says Eagles are No 1 team in NFL: ‘They’re very special’
Know your enemy, a base requirement at war...love seeing him
No, you are talking about winning, and the top level is then ignored....you stand corrected on issue. Good team is the point.
You can need both...it's not either/or. You can draft the best rookie yearly but if he spends a few years knowing he can keep collecting a check by not winning anything, then it becomes ok. Pats culture has zero talent right now.Talent wins games, not toughness, not culture.
If culture mattered, the Patriots wouldn't be so terrible.
Culture doesn't matter without talent, nor does it exist without talent. There's no such thing as culture without talent.You can need both...it's not either/or. You can draft the best rookie yearly but if he spends a few years knowing he can keep collecting a check by not winning anything, then it becomes ok. Pats culture has zero talent right now.
Wrong. Completely wrong. Sure there is. The New Orleans Saints used to lose every year and they would bring in cast offs past their prime, have their owner dance around with an umbrella if they did win, etc. That was their crazy culture. The Tampa Bay Bucs had John McCay being funny and losing all the time. That's why there is a phrase "losing culture." Part of that is running a team like a business and not caring about the product/talent.Culture doesn't matter without talent, nor does it exist without talent. There's no such thing as culture without talent.
You're literally making my point that talent breeds culture.Wrong. Completely wrong. Sure there is. The New Orleans Saints used to lose every year and they would bring in cast offs past their prime, have their owner dance around with an umbrella if they did win, etc. That was their crazy culture. The Tampa Bay Bucs had John McCay being funny and losing all the time. That's why there is a phrase "losing culture." Part of that is running a team like a business and not caring about the product/talent.
This is the second time in a year I've said something to you and then your lack of reading comprehension kicks in. A losing culture exists. It's talked about all the time. A winning culture exists. Your quote was "There's no such thing as culture without talent." That is false. Blatantly false. Stop spinning in circles.You're literally making my point that talent breeds culture.
Right..If that's the case, then your point is that Dallas has no chance of doing that at any point under the Jones regime.
The idea that the culture was right when they smoked Tampa but not when they lost to SF is nonsensical.
Lol shut upThis is the second time in a year I've said something to you and then your lack of reading comprehension kicks in. A losing culture exists. It's talked about all the time. A winning culture exists. Your quote was "There's no such thing as culture without talent." That is false. Blatantly false. Stop spinning in circles.
The culture is a problem . But our talent isn’t strong enough not only to overcome the better teams nor are we talented enough to overcome our culture.Lol shut up
This is a preposterous argument. Do I really need to clarify that there's no such thing as "winning" culture without talent? Like does that really need to be said?
The culture is a core issue.I'm in the camp that talent wins. Player talent. Coaching talent.
All this touchy feely "culture" stuff is nonsense- as if there is a disease dripping down from above (the front office).
Winning teams are assigned "culture", but they win because they have the players and the coaching. I'll argue that it's mostly players.
If this team had an elite QB, you would be surprised at how much "culture" they instantly obtained!
No possibility that teams like SF and Phil for example are simply more talented ?Gotta be more to it. At some point it's grown men vs grown men on a football field. How can we be "tough" enough to win 12 games and a wild card, yet flame out in the divisional round? Does any "toughness" we have immediately dissipate in this specific round of the playoffs? I think it's coaching and discipline.
How is preposterous? Yes, if you don't state something clearly, it's not my fault. There is both a losing culture and a winning culture. Your first argument was that talent wins out and culture doesn't matter. Then you straight out said "Culture doesn't matter without talent, nor does it exist without talent. There's no such thing as culture without talent." It's a blanket statement. There are plenty of bad teams whose organization cares about business and not talent and that is the culture they built. It is a losing culture. So yes there can be culture without talent. It is a losing one. Write more precisely if you don't want to be challenged. With all that said...Lol shut up
This is a preposterous argument. Do I really need to clarify that there's no such thing as "winning" culture without talent? Like does that really need to be said?
Yes, our culture is a problem but if we think our talent is greater than some of our key contenders who are having more success then we are in denial our talent or lack of in some key areas is a contributing factor as well.How is preposterous? Yes, if you don't state something clearly, it's not my fault. There is both a losing culture and a winning culture. Your first argument was that talent wins out and culture doesn't matter. Then you straight out said "Culture doesn't matter without talent, nor does it exist without talent. There's no such thing as culture without talent." It's a blanket statement. There are plenty of bad teams whose organization cares about business and not talent and that is the culture they built. It is a losing culture. So yes there can be culture without talent. It is a losing one. Write more precisely if you don't want to be challenged. With all that said...
My original point stands to your statement "Talent wins games, not toughness, not culture." It's a mix. You can have all the talent in the world and have no one to rein it in. You need the right culture to cultivate it.