The 1970's Cowboys were thought of by most people to be a "finesse" team, not a "physical" team like the Steelers, or the Raiders, or even the Rams.
Yet somehow this "finesse" team made it to 5 Super Bowls and won 2.
The NFL is a tough sport.
Sorry, Bob and others, I don't buy for a minute this team is "soft", they won 12 games two years in a row, no "soft" team could do that.
"Soft" teams would get constantly blasted 42-10 like the 49ers did to us.
The longer I watch the NFL the more it's evident to me that winning SBs is by far only a combination of having skilled players and skilled coaches. All of the accolades given to Purdy are premature, imho, in 4 out of 7 games this season he's had 0 or 1 tds per game. Our much-maligned Dak has 0 or 1 td in 5 of 7, not much different. If he gets 2 td passes this week that would be 5 of 7 games, even closer.
Dallas, year in and year out, is always supposedly a "very talented team". And that's somewhat true, but only because the talent level is well-distributed acorss the league. Every team has talented players, doesn't take but a couple of exceptional players added to the roster to bump it up to contender status.
I tire of watching other teams get minimal penalties, their quarterback standing in the pocket for 6-7-8 seconds unpressured, with nearly always a receiver wide open and having their defenders draped all over our receivers like a second skin.
Our plays are vanilla, our blocking, especially pass blocking, usually mediocre. We continue to hang on to Tyron Smith and Biasdasz and other players in key positions who simply aren't up to the level needed. We promote a career backup quarterback to head coach after little NFL seasoning, and then wonder why the SBs don't just roll into the trophy case. We hire past their prime coaches like Parcells and McCarthy, then fire a coach like Chan Gailey after only 2 years, even though he got the Cowboys to the playoffs both years he was here.
No, softness isn't the problem, it starts and ends with Jerry Jones....