FuzzyLumpkins said:So basically the Saints media and Pasquarelli is saying its a 4th round pick via this guy which the Times Picayune is not disputing despite your falsification.
Cogan said:Here is the article from the Biloxi Sun Herald by Larry Holder:
Alexander said:So how exactly is Clayton any worse than Pasquarelli or Mortenson or any of the other journalists that work for them. They have been wrong in the past. And rarely printed retractions or denials.
And it was also a relatively minor trade that isn't necessarily going to have anyone go back and remind them to verify anything. This wasn't the Herschel Walker trade. The fact that ESPN has not modified anything is not that significant.
Another facet of the team website, is why on earth would the Dallas official site continue to say the same story, over and over again, if it were false. Are we to assume the due diligence from the team website doesn't exist either? And moreover, why would they lie about it being a lower round draft choice? It's not like we can fool anyone until next April.
No, just team sources, which might be even better.
So, you discredit the official sites writers, yet expect the New Orleans Saints ones to be on the ball? Aren't they all insignificant worms in comparison to the journalistic giant that is Len Pasquarelli?
Look here.
http://www.nola.com/sports/t-p/index.ssf?/base/sports-25/115640013250270.xml&coll=1
Who is lying here?
Sorry, yours is from the 23rd. Mine is more recent.
So please do us all a favor and stop presenting nonsense to support your own take.
FuzzyLumpkins said:If you dont understand how the fact that that site has both articles still up at this very moment and how that muddles the whole picture I dont know what will.
All that shows is that The Times Picayune has no credibility.
I just take umbrage that you have to be a condescending jerk to anyone who just isnt positive that it has to be a 7th round pick.
Alexander said:So, explain this to me.
You mean to say that Len Pasquarelli was wrong?
This cannot be!
Alexander said:Falsification?
I am not trying to make you look foolish. But when you call someone a liar, you better have all your ducks in a row, my friend.
Angus said:And Parcells can't be wrong either. He said it was a provisional pick.
Alexander said:And if you don't understand how information can change in one day's time as more information is uncovered, I don't know what will help you understand either.
No it means one story was published at a later time which has nothing to say about "credibility".
FuzzyLumpkins said:You seem to fail to understand that your opinion on that matter really matters to me not at all.
I looked at the site and saw that it said it was an undisclosed draft pick so I called you a liar. It turns out they have another story there that says a 4th round pick quoting 'league sources.'
At best you didnt give the full picture opf what is going on over at that newspaper and that in my book is still deception whether it was intentional or not.
Deal with it.
DefendeR said:I heard Pat Kirwan talking about a possible Chargers-Saints trade that stalled because the Chargers wanted a first day pick(3rd rounder) from the Saints for Donnie Edwards.The Saints were offering a 4th rounder.
Cogan said:Well, I've tried twice, now. This time I'll just put in the link to the story, & my post won't get deleted! This is the story from the Sun Herald in Biloxi.
http://www.sunherald.com/mld/sunherald/sports/football/nfl/new_orleans_saints/15346937.htm
There, hopefully, you can click on to it & read for yourself. Guess we're not allowed to copy newspapers on here, although I see it all the time.
Hope this is true. It will help kill the sting of losing high rd. picks lately like Peterman & Henson.
theogt said:This is almost as good as one of my pointless debates.
Alexander said:And again, the information cited in my link was more recent. So how exactly is that "another" story. It is called updating information.
It isn't deception when I am not so lazy as to quote an older article to support my assertion. I presented my evidence long before you decided to show up with your own idiotic assertions (and insinuations of me lying), which were based on pretty pathetic information.
If anyone is without the "full picture" and didn't bother to present it, it is you.
I am beginning to think you have a serious reading comprehension problem or cannot admit when you have been made a fool out of.
Deal with it.
TruBlueCowboy said:So can anyone give us the cliff notes version if I don't want to read through all 100 replies?
Did we, or did we not get the 4th?
If we got the 7th... meh.
If we got the 4th... holy Tom Landry in heaven, we just robbed the Saints. Someone ask Sean Payton and the other former Cowboys coaches if they want more of their former boys. We'll depart with Drew Henson for the low low price of a 4th rounder too.![]()