We ruined Garrett

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,979
Reaction score
37,508
People forget how great Garrett was when he was first here, because of how bad he sucks now and for a few years.

He was getting offers from everyone and they momma

That was off 2007 and by 2009 Rams fans were furious when rumors started that JG got the coaching job and inundated the FO with angry phone calls that the Rams FO denied it..
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
84,135
Reaction score
76,755
It was fun and dynamic.

But he and Romo blew a few games and leads and all the fans wanted his head, and I'm pretty sure Jerry said something. Nobody just changes like that.
That's this fanbase though. They live in the moment....now we suffer for it.
 

atlantacowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
19,529
Reaction score
27,060
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yes we sure did.

When we first got Garrett he was ultra aggressive, passed the rock down people's throat, and we were better offensively.

After he had a bad game or 2 people wanted his head, so therefore he changed up and got ultra conservative on offense.

Which in turn hurt Romo and our offense.

When it was 3rd and 3 or late in the game with a lead instead of doing the obvious, he went balls out and kept the foot on the throat. Yeah we got burned for that a few times, but that Garrett was 10x better than this Garrett

Uh no. That was Romo. Garret has always been a bad play caller. His best year was his first (2007) when he had Tony Sporano holding his hand. Garret literally built his career in Dallas on Romo's arm and ability to improvise.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,979
Reaction score
37,508
We also leveraged a draft in 2008, one year after Sporano left, to bring in Roy Williams, because it was supposedly the fact Garrett didn’t have a second WR that his offense was stagnating.
 

mmohican29

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,485
Reaction score
6,414
It was fun and dynamic.

But he and Romo blew a few games and leads and all the fans wanted his head, and I'm pretty sure Jerry said something. Nobody just changes like that.


There's a gram of truth to what you're saying- but he had different and better offensive personnel in the games you reference and in addition a more balanced- capable attack which which was neglected up 28 points against a Detroit.

Look, however you want to look at it- it's not working. He needs to go. And the faster the better. This team stinks, and he had a hand in selecting almost 100% of the personnel on it. This Offense is embarassingly bad. I mean- rock bottom, Brandon Weeden, Brad Johnson, and Matt Cassel level bad.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,745
Reaction score
95,285
Yes we sure did.

When we first got Garrett he was ultra aggressive, passed the rock down people's throat, and we were better offensively.

After he had a bad game or 2 people wanted his head, so therefore he changed up and got ultra conservative on offense.

Which in turn hurt Romo and our offense.

When it was 3rd and 3 or late in the game with a lead instead of doing the obvious, he went balls out and kept the foot on the throat. Yeah we got burned for that a few times, but that Garrett was 10x better than this Garrett

Is this a legit post?

LOL.

You can tell the Garrett fans are running out of excuses when they then turn to blame the fans for Garrett’s issues.
 

Bob-Lillys-War

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,356
Reaction score
28,851
9 years .. 6 million dollars a year ...

$54,000,000.00 for Garrett.

How did WE ruin Garrett, while he destroyed this team's chances ?
 
Top