Personally I feel Lynch is much better value in the bottom of the first round. He had tremendous upside with development. .......which is what a QB we draft would be, a development. We aren't a team like Panthers, Raiders, Browns, Vikings. Cincy that needed a starter day 1.
Wentz has so much hype I'm willing to bet anybody, anything they want he never lives up to the hype. ....not sure Montana could
the key point is "develop".............does the regression of another spread offense/system very raw QB in Dustin Vaughn give anyone a lot of confidence the present Dallas coaching staff can develop any QB let alone another guy who has simply run plays......and not learned to play the game on his own.
I think that is why they ran the Senior Bowl without a playbook handed out...........they wanted to look at guys that would be somewhat like Romo.........to be able to "leave the reservation" (B.Parcels) and basically massage the playbook on the go out on the field............knowing their playbook on its own merits doesn't get it done. They are looking for a guy who can play the game ala Romo, not run a play cause its in the playbook.
Goff.........what scare me most about him...........for all his supposed merits.........in 3 years as a starter at Cal, he's won only 14 games as a starter......Was the Pac 10 that strong, was their non-conf. schedule that imposing?.............I'll pass on him,
Yup, I'm a Wentz/ NDSU homer, buried in here somewhere after Wentz's 1st FCS championship game is a statement that is the Cowboys next Qb........hate to see him go to a Cleveland as their OLine gets decimated by free agency........If he has a agent with gravitias they should be dropping hints that they will not sign with Cleveland, new coach or not......its the ownership