I agree Doc and it's troubling. No way is Tony making the calls on this - the staff should've been recommending it and they didn't and the only reason I can see is that on the one in a million chance we made the playoffs he could've played. It just seemed like a no brainer after the second fracture and third overall.
Can you please give us some insight as to this procedure. Will it strengthen the entire area to the point of prior to the first fracture or is it a stop gap to reinforce an area that has been traumatized twice in a year?
Surgery is the only way to return the shoulder support structure to its original end-to-end configuration when there's a complete clavicular fracture; otherwise the clavicle will be shortened. Since it was his non-throwing shoulder, that was less of an issue, but now he's had a rebreak before complete union. With the offseason ahead, there's no reason not to repair it properly, instead of having the bones heal side-to-side.
The internal fixation is not used to make the bone stronger; its purpose is to hold the fracture site entirely stable so that proper anatomy is maintained during the healing process. It is not sufficient to set this type of fracture and expect to stay in position, since it can't be casted.
He'll be fine next year, until the next violent sack.