If Pro Bowls are so meaningless, then why are they used as a criteria for the Hall of Fame. They always mention the of number of Pro Bowls in addition to other awards in order to justify induction into the Hall of Fame
Is Pro Bowl designation flawed in some cases? of course! There is no perfect criteria in order to determine the best players in the league.in fact, there shouldn't be any criteria in order to judge a player because it is a team sport and that is the answer to my question, after all.
Despite having better players, the Cowboys are unable to build better teams. This is because, in the past, the Cowboys drafted purely on talent without regard to whether that talent was compatible with the Cowboys style of play.
Quite often, great Cowboys players have been misused. One example is how they tried to turn the team that Parcells built into a prolific passing offense. Guys like Columbo, Gerode, Adams, and Davis were not built to pass protect, they were built to move defenders out of the way. However, Garrett was constantly trying to fill round holes with square pegs when it came to the Cowboys offense.
Spears and Canty were never built to be prolific pass rushers. They were built for a true 3-4 defense were they tie up the O-line so the LB's can get the stats. In truth, Ware wasn't designed to be a linebacker, he was a genuine pass rusher, the type that is featured in a 4-3 defense.
By using Ware almost exclusively as a pass rusher, the Cowboys were destroying a fundamental concept of a 3-4 defense, the 4th "mystery" pass rusher that can come from anywhere. This was what kept O-lines nervous. In the case of the Cowboys. because everybody knew the 4th pass rusher was almost always Ware, they became a 4-3 defense that just lined up incorrectly on every play