blueblood70
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 42,080
- Reaction score
- 28,661
found plastic man
stash looks good in green paint.
so sometimes reality vs perception is bigGood point. The Eagles’ emphasis on linemen is prudent. Now that they have to pay their quarterback too, though, the playing field between Dallas and Philly will be equal. Difficult schedules for both teams this season compared to last season. Another tight race.
don't, like Never? did we not find our starting safety's in Kearse and hooker along with the drafted Wilson as great group now?? we drafted Bland and added Gilmore with other young corners still being developed id say that draft and FA.. traded for cooper drafted Gallup and Lamb developed lamb let cooper go and added cooks..The FO doesn't supplement their great drafting with great FA's. It takes both to be successful in the playoffs
Its pretty obvious. Eagles use other means then just the draft. They also draft more important positions like Oline and Dline when we draft RB's and get punters in the pro bowl. They have also had much better coaching than we have. Cmon Garrett for 14 years here? There is your answer.Since 2000, the Cowboys have drafted a total of 30 players that have made at least one Pro Bowl. These players have combined for 92 Pro Bowls. During those same, most recent 23 drafts, the Eagles have selected 21 players with at least one Pro Bowl for a combined total of 48 Pro Bowls.
The Cowboys have a third more Pro Bowlers with almost double the combined Pro Bowls compared to the Eagles.
Furthermore:
Cowboys drafted since 2000 have produced 180 times that a draft pick was the starter for a particular season. In total, they participated in 3515 games
The Eagles, meanwhile, have produced 132 starts for their picks in the same drafts with a total participation of 2469 games.
And yet:
The Eagles have made the playoffs 15 times since 2000, playing in 7 conference championship games and 2 Super Bowls.
The Cowboys have made the playoffs 9 times since 2000.
How is this possible?
The Cowboys looked to be drafting better than the Eagles since 2000. The Eagles seem to do better with less. Again, how is this possible?
In my opinion, there are two possibilities. One of them would be poor management of both the salary cap and veteran free agency. The other would be poor coaching with an emphasis on gameplanning.
Obviously, the Cowboys had superior talent in the draft. Considering the results, this could be a case of coaches not knowing how to deploy their weapons, poor strategy. Then again, it could be poor free agency choices, trades, or contracts. It could be very poor cap management.
Clearly, it's not a matter of talent from the draft. What do you think it is?
Or ref bias.Can’t ignore leading the league in penalties or being close to it for many years now. Penalties at critical times have taken points off the board and killed momentum in games……that’s just one aspect to consider. Discipline
Over the last 27 years, they have been miserable in FA. Yes, Kearse is a stud, but most of the players they've brought in are tier 2 guys.don't, like Never? did we not find our starting safety's in Kearse and hooker along with the drafted Wilson as great group now?? we drafted Bland and added Gilmore with other young corners still being developed id say that draft and FA.. traded for cooper drafted Gallup and Lamb developed lamb let cooper go and added cooks..
the narratives are overblown on them doing nothing or not enough over the names and cost of our FAs, fans dont get their way the narrative is they are cheap and do nothing in FA , doesn't mean we dont build teams with FAS.. we tried with Poe and McCoy plus others..
Last year Barr, peters, Hankins, Maher, fowler, TY Hilton and others contributed to that 2nd round playoff berth.. not enough for fans because the did get the ones on their lists.,
Go that route, see how it works out for you.and that supposed to keep me from bring up the obvious too much rival talk all season, off season and its all boot licking vs real cowboy fans HATE the East rivals yet here we are in Cowboys forum talking up the eagles. sorry you lie the tastes of eagle boot but it shows how weak-minded Cowboys fans have got..
ILL just kleep posting anti-eagles posts every single one i see , as matter fact ill save a bunch for easy copy and paste responses to go to every non-cowboys post and muddle it up.
carry on, ready ,set, go.....
threats by a power wielding staff..i see, dont like it when the games played the same way so go full censorship.. i stand by my complaint, this is Cowboys ZONE area and is for Cowboys topics not eagles or any other NFL team.
1st amendment only works when the topics are pro-powers that be,, got it rules only apply to us but hey if you like Cowboys bashing and posts that clearly by rules don't belong in this area, let it fly , fly eagles fly.
found the infiltrators.
They probably did. However, they were not in a position of authority to do anything about it because of who their "real" head coach was.I wonder why the entire coaching staff didn’t see that?
Umm, “this” doesn’t tell us anything beyond the fact that the Eagles managed to win a Super Bowl.Since 2000, the Cowboys have drafted a total of 30 players that have made at least one Pro Bowl. These players have combined for 92 Pro Bowls. During those same, most recent 23 drafts, the Eagles have selected 21 players with at least one Pro Bowl for a combined total of 48 Pro Bowls.
The Cowboys have a third more Pro Bowlers with almost double the combined Pro Bowls compared to the Eagles.
Furthermore:
Cowboys drafted since 2000 have produced 180 times that a draft pick was the starter for a particular season. In total, they participated in 3515 games
The Eagles, meanwhile, have produced 132 starts for their picks in the same drafts with a total participation of 2469 games.
And yet:
The Eagles have made the playoffs 15 times since 2000, playing in 7 conference championship games and 2 Super Bowls.
The Cowboys have made the playoffs 9 times since 2000.
How is this possible?
The Cowboys looked to be drafting better than the Eagles since 2000. The Eagles seem to do better with less. Again, how is this possible?
In my opinion, there are two possibilities. One of them would be poor management of both the salary cap and veteran free agency. The other would be poor coaching with an emphasis on gameplanning.
Obviously, the Cowboys had superior talent in the draft. Considering the results, this could be a case of coaches not knowing how to deploy their weapons, poor strategy. Then again, it could be poor free agency choices, trades, or contracts. It could be very poor cap management.
Clearly, it's not a matter of talent from the draft. What do you think it is?
Yes, but how?Umm, “this” doesn’t tell us anything beyond the fact that the Eagles managed to win a Super Bowl.
We’re behind on that front and that’s all that matters.
Disagree. The Eagles are loaded w/ draft talent, which they've very wisely supplemented w/ smart FA signings such as Hargrave, AJ Brown, and their defensive backfield. However, their entire OL was built from the draft, as well as Cox, Hurts, Sanders, Goedert, Devonta Smith, and Graham.Yes, but how?
The facts I mentioned eliminated draft talent as a reason. You disagree and that's fair, so far as you discuss why.
I then invited anyone else with an opinion to discuss what they think the issue is and I enjoyed the responses.
You've expressed an opinion but why should anyone consider it without explanation? Don't you want to discuss it?
They were lucky the Colts were dumb to trade for Wentz, as that was Reich thinking he could have success with him.Disagree. The Eagles are loaded w/ draft talent, which they've very wisely supplemented w/ smart FA signings such as Hargrave, AJ Brown, and their defensive backfield. However, their entire OL was built from the draft, as well as Cox, Hurts, Sanders, Goedert, Devonta Smith, and Graham.
The Eagles are a perfect example of how you use the draft in conjunction with FA and trades to build a contender. They also benefitted greatly from the brilliant Wentz trade and even moreso from having the foresight to dump a player for valuable resources.
NO, unlike you and those like you who are happy as pigs in slop to make the playoffs, they want Lombardi's and all your excuse making does not make up for our failure to SNIFF ONE IN 27 YEARS while your hero and company have been running things.don't, like Never? did we not find our starting safety's in Kearse and hooker along with the drafted Wilson as great group now?? we drafted Bland and added Gilmore with other young corners still being developed id say that draft and FA.. traded for cooper drafted Gallup and Lamb developed lamb let cooper go and added cooks..
the narratives are overblown on them doing nothing or not enough over the names and cost of our FAs, fans dont get their way the narrative is they are cheap and do nothing in FA , doesn't mean we dont build teams with FAS.. we tried with Poe and McCoy plus others..
Last year Barr, peters, Hankins, Maher, fowler, TY Hilton and others contributed to that 2nd round playoff berth.. not enough for fans because the did get the ones on their lists.,
It was a stroke of genius. Don't act like it wasn't!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!They were lucky the Colts were dumb to trade for Wentz, as that was Reich thinking he could have success with him.
if not for that, no one would have made that trade for Wentz.
Don't act it was a stroke of genius from them.
However, yes, the use of FA and the draft saved them well. But Dallas has had better draft success. But the refusal of getting better players in FA has made a difference in a negative way so far.
Well possibly so far. It could prove long term Dallas did better by not over paying FA's, long term.