Imagine asking this question? LOL. My Lord.I think if he is seriously and genuinely asking this question and not trolling then anything and everything he says about football or how the game should be played deserves to be ignored and deleted.
Because asking a Cowboys message board this question instead of Google says you’re either trolling or clueless.
These FO apologists couch their "questions" very carefully. They seem to try to parse the words "trade for" and "sign as a FA" as if the final result isn't the same.What he leaves out (not surprised) is the reason they traded for Cooks is because they traded Amari with no backup option and expecting Gallup to come back 100 percent. Again overrating their own talent, and not thinking ahead.
Lol, A few people provided the information I was looking for.Wow ........ this thread did not go how the Jerry appreciation club planned.
Eh I actually forgot they traded for Hankins, thought he was late season fa pick up.Not sure if this is sarcasm. They traded for Hankins. And signed him to a 1 year deal. If that is a big time free agent aquisition for you I feel bad for you lol.
Ill answer though. Last time they spent in FA was Brandon Carr. In 2012.
I've already answered tis to person who replied.big time aquisition
Those are not the same as Hargrave, or trading for CMC, Trent, Williams etc.Eh I actually forgot they traded for Hankins, thought he was late season fa pick up.
The question wasn't big time, it was of note.
To that point.
Malik Hooker-See below point.
Jayron Kearse-Was decent until he got paid.
Dorrence Armstrong-Again. Drafted.
Dante Fowler-Barely sees the field.
All have provided solid play during most of their time here Have all contributed to 3 12-5 seasons. I would say they qualify as players of note.
Not sure why OP was attacked. He asked a question, one that btw can be answered by going to
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/
It's an interesting thing to go thru other teams FA signing to see just how they work out for all teams.
Thats because the OP brought up the Niners. Who actually made BIG TIME FA aquisitions. Hence the reference.I've already answered tis to person who replied.
The question I responded to was fa of note. You're the 2nd guy to change that to big time.
Reading comprehension goes a very long way when you actually want discussion and not just sling barbs at people.
Imagine making assumptions on intent of another person's question.Imagine how delusional you must be. As a fan of the Cowboys. To use the Chiefs (2 SB wins and 4 appearances in the last 6 years) and the Niners (2 SB appearances in recent memory) to try and prop up what the Dallas FO has done in the player aquisition department.
Lets compare Trent Williams, and CMC to Gilmore, Cooks and Hankins.
LOL. LOL. LOL.
Again of note is vastly different than top players.Those are not the same as Hargrave, or trading for CMC, Trent, Williams etc.
Nice...because someone does not think like you want them to, you put them on ignore. Pretty soon you will log in and only see yourself posting. lolImagine making assumptions on intent of another person's question.
Most of this board doesn't want actual conversation you want a platform to sling your negative attacks at coaches players gms owners and other Cowboys fans.
It's quite sophomoric most days.
My ignore list grows by the day.
You don't think having javon hargrave , cmc, and trent williams wouldn't have made this team better?Better question would have been, if we had acquired all those players that either team got, would it have put us over the top? Personally, I don't think so.
I am fine actually. The fact you think we dont know what you were trying to do is hilarious to me.Actually, you blew up for no reason.