cobra;2869856 said:
It's obvious that some people are just wholly against a kickoff specialist. Fine. That's there choice.
It's not an unheard of proposition, but it would be a rarity for this team. And new ways of doing thing are considered bad.
I don't think having a kickoff specialist is any more odd than having a long snap specialist taking up a spot..
It mostly depends on whether or not you can afford it numbers-wise.
If we were talking about unlimited roster spots, it would not be an issue. Of course there is a place for a kicker who can swing the field possession our way. But at what cost? An extra lineman? Defensive back? Linebacker?
Fact is, we are going to have to have this player active each and every game in most cases. And we might in a best case scenario get five plays out of him. That means we have to have fewer players active than normal at certain positions (for example, dressing four WRs instead of three, four CBs instead of five).
A KO specialist is a luxury, just as a snapper is. But I think the two positions are completely different in both scope and utility. A snapper will long and short snap, on field goals and also punts. Often the snapper is a player who can possibly play backup center, defensive line, tight end or linebacker.
The simple fact of the matter is that it is very likely we will have to burn not one, but two roster spots on specialists who do nothing but their assignments. That's why they have Matt Stewart seeing if he can snap well enough to dump LaDouceur. That's why we also want safeties who could be cornerbacks. Again though, it is bit of a moot point since we will likely have two specialists dressed and active every game.
I cannot think of a single kickoff specialist who ever did more than kick off. That is the difference between your comparison. It is not the same, unless that snapper does nothing else or isn't at least capable of doing something else in a worst case scenario. Are you convinced he can? I am not.
To me a snapper is far more important than a kickoff specialist, even if he is Superman and capable of zooming down the field and stopping the returner in his tracks with his heat vision.
Are we that secure across the roster at several positions that we could afford to go light on gamedays simply because we are obligated have two specialists? I am not prepared to think we are.
We are playing with numbers. The principle behind the idea is okay, except most teams cannot or will not afford themselves to indulge in the luxury. It will make the inactive lists tougher to do each week.