I agree. It was basically a draft pick for cap space deal that they couldn’t agree upon. My point is that they’d be using both cap space and draft resources to backfill a void that they created.
I think that he was this team’s best receiver and they gave him away. And the offense and quarterback have clearly not been as effective without him.
Fans want to talk up “6-2” like it’s the greatest thing in the world. But how does a potential 8-0 look if they had Cooper and a more efficient offense?
Can we say definitively what the offense is though? I think we can be much more effective than last year, maybe not as explosive but effective.
I like Dak as a top 8-12 QB, I think he’s definitely a capable franchise QB. But I do not think he’s a guy you ask to throw 35-40+ times a game and expect to win big. Very few guys can do that.
With the 3 headed monster at WR, this is still a pass happy offense with Moore and Dak. To me the silver linings of the Amari departure and Dak injury were that we forced Moore to go with a run oriented offense. Much more 13 personnel with these rookie TE’s and a better split between Zeke and Pollard. Much happier with this version of the offense schematically because it actually plays to the QB’s strengths instead of asking him to be Superman.
Would I rather have another playmaker? Sure. Do I trust that Moore would’ve made this necessary switch had we kept Coop? Not at all. Much more comfortable with Prescott as the secondary playmaker rather than the primary.